Classic Traveller .pdfs

[Random Goblin]

Because the Army is sending me there.

I'm part of a platoon being assembled piecemeal from my battalion to fill rotation requirements while also trying to not re-deploy the guys in the battalion who just got back from Iraq last year.

It's a volunteer mission, which means I, a junior enlisted infantryman, got volunteered for it.

 

[Random Goblin]

Because the Army is sending me there.

I'm part of a platoon being assembled piecemeal from my battalion to fill rotation requirements while also trying to not re-deploy the guys in the battalion who just got back from Iraq last year.

It's a volunteer mission, which means I, a junior enlisted infantryman, got volunteered for it.

 

[tjoneslo]

Originally posted by Casey:
Interesting. That lists the three vehicle Traveller Aides as being for CT but there's only T20 stats in them. Is T20 vehicle design *that* compatible with Striker?

They are not that compatible. If you were desperate I could come up with a conversion between the two but it would hardly be any less number intensive than simply rebuiling in one or the other systems.

 

[tjoneslo]

Originally posted by Casey:
Interesting. That lists the three vehicle Traveller Aides as being for CT but there's only T20 stats in them. Is T20 vehicle design *that* compatible with Striker?

They are not that compatible. If you were desperate I could come up with a conversion between the two but it would hardly be any less number intensive than simply rebuiling in one or the other systems.

 

[clementk]

Originally posted by tjoneslo:
They are not that compatible. If you were desperate I could come up with a conversion between the two but it would hardly be any less number intensive than simply rebuiling in one or the other systems.

Thanks, but it's not needed for me at least. <shrugs> That goes along with my thoughts on the CT-ness of the vehicle TA's.

 

[clementk]

Originally posted by tjoneslo:
They are not that compatible. If you were desperate I could come up with a conversion between the two but it would hardly be any less number intensive than simply rebuiling in one or the other systems.

Thanks, but it's not needed for me at least. <shrugs> That goes along with my thoughts on the CT-ness of the vehicle TA's.

 

[hunter]

The TA PDFs are quite compatible with the basic CT rules, but not with Striker. The design system itself was built to reproduce the original vehicles in the CT core books as closely as possible.

Hunter

 

[hunter]

The TA PDFs are quite compatible with the basic CT rules, but not with Striker. The design system itself was built to reproduce the original vehicles in the CT core books as closely as possible.

Hunter