BlackBat242
SOC-14 1K
Precisely - the various military academies, military colleges, and military prep schools have a book's worth (a large book, or even an encyclopedia) of incidents where students/cadets were punished or shunned by other students/cadets for reporting dishonorable or criminal behavior on the part of other students/cadets.
It is a fact of human social structure that any peer group will, unless actively controlled, develop an identity that favors "insiders" over "outsiders - and the instructors and their rules/laws often become categorized as "outsiders" to be worked against.
In this case of the killing of a species outsider (the vargr), the culprit was a popular student/cadet figure, and many students would refuse to believe that he had actually killed the "outsider" - they would believe that Flashy was being framed by the PTB, and that the informer student/cadet was aiding that frame-up and cover-up of the actual killer's identity.
Therefore, many of the students would look down on or shun the informer due to their own beliefs and social structure without regard to the objective truth or correctness of the informer's actions, or of their own.
Besides - most students/cadets eventually do something that is a violation of the rules - most times it is so minor that no one thinks of reporting it to the staff - but a "known informer" would be expected (rightly or wrongly) to report every violation, no matter minor or harmless - thus no one would want him in close association.
This is simply a reality of human social interaction, and I am NOT saying it is "right" in any way - I am just admitting that it is reality.
It is a fact of human social structure that any peer group will, unless actively controlled, develop an identity that favors "insiders" over "outsiders - and the instructors and their rules/laws often become categorized as "outsiders" to be worked against.
In this case of the killing of a species outsider (the vargr), the culprit was a popular student/cadet figure, and many students would refuse to believe that he had actually killed the "outsider" - they would believe that Flashy was being framed by the PTB, and that the informer student/cadet was aiding that frame-up and cover-up of the actual killer's identity.
Therefore, many of the students would look down on or shun the informer due to their own beliefs and social structure without regard to the objective truth or correctness of the informer's actions, or of their own.
Besides - most students/cadets eventually do something that is a violation of the rules - most times it is so minor that no one thinks of reporting it to the staff - but a "known informer" would be expected (rightly or wrongly) to report every violation, no matter minor or harmless - thus no one would want him in close association.
This is simply a reality of human social interaction, and I am NOT saying it is "right" in any way - I am just admitting that it is reality.