• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Help needed with MT: Referee's Manual Design Sequence

snrdg082102

SOC-14 1K
Hello all,

I mentioned in another post that I've been working on an Excel spreadsheet for the design sequence in the MT: Referee's manual and for the 3 part Wet Navy article in Challenge 53, 54, and 60.

Well, I've completed rebuilding the design sequence and tested using Joe Fugate's article "A MT: Starship Design Example" in the Travellers' Digest #13. The spreadsheet appears to work, but I found some eratta that threw off the numbers. However, there is one area I've not got a handle on which is needed for the Technical Readout. How can I create an automated process for determining the UCP Factors for the Turret Weapons on pp. 73 and 74.


Since I haven't figured out how to automate the Turret Weapon UCP Factor, I moved on to the Design Evaluation section (MT: Referee's Manual pp. 84-89). This has led me to another item I can't seem to get a handle on, which is determining the speed for an airframe hull through a thin atmosphere using the information on p. 86. Here are the numbers I have been working with:

2G Maneuver Drive = Top Vacuum Speed 2,120 (kph)
Hull configuration Needle/Wedge Air Frame (AF)
Standard Atmosphere Top Speed for an AF =
Top Vacuum Speed x 90%

2,120 x .9 = 1,908 kph.

Thin atmosphere speed, p. 86 Column 2 second line from the bottom states speed is 1.5 x Standard Atmosphere.

1,908 * 1.5 = 2,862 kph.

How can the thin atmosphere be faster than the speed in a vacuum?
 
Hello all,

I mentioned in another post that I've been working on an Excel spreadsheet for the design sequence in the MT: Referee's manual and for the 3 part Wet Navy article in Challenge 53, 54, and 60.

Well, I've completed rebuilding the design sequence and tested using Joe Fugate's article "A MT: Starship Design Example" in the Travellers' Digest #13. The spreadsheet appears to work, but I found some eratta that threw off the numbers. However, there is one area I've not got a handle on which is needed for the Technical Readout. How can I create an automated process for determining the UCP Factors for the Turret Weapons on pp. 73 and 74.


Since I haven't figured out how to automate the Turret Weapon UCP Factor, I moved on to the Design Evaluation section (MT: Referee's Manual pp. 84-89). This has led me to another item I can't seem to get a handle on, which is determining the speed for an airframe hull through a thin atmosphere using the information on p. 86. Here are the numbers I have been working with:

2G Maneuver Drive = Top Vacuum Speed 2,120 (kph)
Hull configuration Needle/Wedge Air Frame (AF)
Standard Atmosphere Top Speed for an AF =
Top Vacuum Speed x 90%

2,120 x .9 = 1,908 kph.

Thin atmosphere speed, p. 86 Column 2 second line from the bottom states speed is 1.5 x Standard Atmosphere.

1,908 * 1.5 = 2,862 kph.

How can the thin atmosphere be faster than the speed in a vacuum?
 
Hello all,

I mentioned in another post that I've been working on an Excel spreadsheet for the design sequence in the MT: Referee's manual and for the 3 part Wet Navy article in Challenge 53, 54, and 60.

Well, I've completed rebuilding the design sequence and tested using Joe Fugate's article "A MT: Starship Design Example" in the Travellers' Digest #13. The spreadsheet appears to work, but I found some eratta that threw off the numbers. However, there is one area I've not got a handle on which is needed for the Technical Readout. How can I create an automated process for determining the UCP Factors for the Turret Weapons on pp. 73 and 74.


Since I haven't figured out how to automate the Turret Weapon UCP Factor, I moved on to the Design Evaluation section (MT: Referee's Manual pp. 84-89). This has led me to another item I can't seem to get a handle on, which is determining the speed for an airframe hull through a thin atmosphere using the information on p. 86. Here are the numbers I have been working with:

2G Maneuver Drive = Top Vacuum Speed 2,120 (kph)
Hull configuration Needle/Wedge Air Frame (AF)
Standard Atmosphere Top Speed for an AF =
Top Vacuum Speed x 90%

2,120 x .9 = 1,908 kph.

Thin atmosphere speed, p. 86 Column 2 second line from the bottom states speed is 1.5 x Standard Atmosphere.

1,908 * 1.5 = 2,862 kph.

How can the thin atmosphere be faster than the speed in a vacuum?
 
"Vaccum speed" is not actually a speed limit, just an artificial reference point.

Automating UCP's:
depends upon which spreadsheet. However, using appleworks (similar syntax to excell, but not identical):
=LOOKUP(B1,F1..F18,E1..E18)
looks for B1 in range F1...F18, then returns a parallel result from cell offset in the range E1...E18.
by changing the "F" cells to "G" cells, you lookup for a different pattern.

Appleworks, Lotus 123, and Excell all have similar feature and syntax.
 
"Vaccum speed" is not actually a speed limit, just an artificial reference point.

Automating UCP's:
depends upon which spreadsheet. However, using appleworks (similar syntax to excell, but not identical):
=LOOKUP(B1,F1..F18,E1..E18)
looks for B1 in range F1...F18, then returns a parallel result from cell offset in the range E1...E18.
by changing the "F" cells to "G" cells, you lookup for a different pattern.

Appleworks, Lotus 123, and Excell all have similar feature and syntax.
 
"Vaccum speed" is not actually a speed limit, just an artificial reference point.

Automating UCP's:
depends upon which spreadsheet. However, using appleworks (similar syntax to excell, but not identical):
=LOOKUP(B1,F1..F18,E1..E18)
looks for B1 in range F1...F18, then returns a parallel result from cell offset in the range E1...E18.
by changing the "F" cells to "G" cells, you lookup for a different pattern.

Appleworks, Lotus 123, and Excell all have similar feature and syntax.
 
Hello Aramis,

Thank-you for the reply and help to my questions.

Okay speed is an artificial reference point for game purposes. Using the constants to figure the Atmospheric speeds for a Streamlined hull in the book returns a Thin atmosphere speed between the Vacuum and Standard Atmosphere speeds. Which is what I expected. The Airframe hull in a Thin Atmosphere I would expect to be closer to, but not exceeding the Vacuum speed.

I'll give the Lookup function a try and let you know later.

Thank-you again for your assistance.


Originally posted by Aramis:
"Vaccum speed" is not actually a speed limit, just an artificial reference point.

Automating UCP's:
depends upon which spreadsheet. However, using appleworks (similar syntax to excell, but not identical):
=LOOKUP(B1,F1..F18,E1..E18)
looks for B1 in range F1...F18, then returns a parallel result from cell offset in the range E1...E18.
by changing the "F" cells to "G" cells, you lookup for a different pattern.

Appleworks, Lotus 123, and Excell all have similar feature and syntax.
 
Hello Aramis,

Thank-you for the reply and help to my questions.

Okay speed is an artificial reference point for game purposes. Using the constants to figure the Atmospheric speeds for a Streamlined hull in the book returns a Thin atmosphere speed between the Vacuum and Standard Atmosphere speeds. Which is what I expected. The Airframe hull in a Thin Atmosphere I would expect to be closer to, but not exceeding the Vacuum speed.

I'll give the Lookup function a try and let you know later.

Thank-you again for your assistance.


Originally posted by Aramis:
"Vaccum speed" is not actually a speed limit, just an artificial reference point.

Automating UCP's:
depends upon which spreadsheet. However, using appleworks (similar syntax to excell, but not identical):
=LOOKUP(B1,F1..F18,E1..E18)
looks for B1 in range F1...F18, then returns a parallel result from cell offset in the range E1...E18.
by changing the "F" cells to "G" cells, you lookup for a different pattern.

Appleworks, Lotus 123, and Excell all have similar feature and syntax.
 
Hello Aramis,

Thank-you for the reply and help to my questions.

Okay speed is an artificial reference point for game purposes. Using the constants to figure the Atmospheric speeds for a Streamlined hull in the book returns a Thin atmosphere speed between the Vacuum and Standard Atmosphere speeds. Which is what I expected. The Airframe hull in a Thin Atmosphere I would expect to be closer to, but not exceeding the Vacuum speed.

I'll give the Lookup function a try and let you know later.

Thank-you again for your assistance.


Originally posted by Aramis:
"Vaccum speed" is not actually a speed limit, just an artificial reference point.

Automating UCP's:
depends upon which spreadsheet. However, using appleworks (similar syntax to excell, but not identical):
=LOOKUP(B1,F1..F18,E1..E18)
looks for B1 in range F1...F18, then returns a parallel result from cell offset in the range E1...E18.
by changing the "F" cells to "G" cells, you lookup for a different pattern.

Appleworks, Lotus 123, and Excell all have similar feature and syntax.
 
Back
Top