I'm still having trouble getting past the "sentient AI is a TL=17 advancement" combined with the fact that Ghandi (as a location) is TL=10 and the Imperial Maximum is TL=15 (with the closest location for that being Rhylanor).
You are missing the point that tech can be brought into "anywhere"
A MegaCorp who wants to spend the money can create a TL F base in a remote desert on an otherwise TL 0 world.
So, when looking for places to hide covert and possibly illegal work....you look for places no one will look at.
For this, Ghandi is perfect because no one wants to live there, while there is massive traffic "through" the system
So, it is a perfect place to look for "downbelow"-like space [Babylon 5 reference] and hide it behind doors no one will look at twice.
So get off the "perfect place for this to happen" and look for the perfect covert location to set something up
The implausibility of a
sentient AI being generated by this research project is ... laughable.
And then there's this factor ...
In other words, sentient consciousness (presumably) cannot arise (spontaneously or by design) within classical computing systems (analog or digital). You need to have some "quantum computing" element built into the system or sentience cannot emerge ... or more to the point for this adventure idea ... SURVIVE.
One of the reasons Dr. Sagan hired me, back in the 1980's was that I was not so smart I could easily ignore what Dr. Hawking missed.
So, while Dr. Hawking hated me for the rest of his life (for that event and other reasons), Dr. Sagan was well pleased with my work and my perceptions.
What you "know to be laughable" is based on the .001% we really know about the subject.
Just like Dr Einstein expecting to create a unified Field Theory when we...as a world...still know so little about the universe. even now, decades after Einstein, with all we've learned since. We are still mere babies with minimal understanding of the universe and an insanely huge ego to support our arrogance.
Take this mildly famous example of the problem into consideration.
Data: "While I believe it is possible download information contained in a positronic brain, I do not believe you have acquired the expertise necessary to preserve the ESSENCE of those experiences. There is an ineffable quality to memory, which I do not believe can survive your procedure."
So, you'd have me accept theory injected into dialog in what has become a derivative science fiction franchise which, forgive me - calls for female actors with "specific curves" to save it's ratings?
When Mr. Goodyear got so frustrated after continued failures with hardening rubber that he threw a sample into the fire, he was not an expert on the chemical properties of the substance. And, when he pulled the sample out and discovered it had hardened, he was still no greater an expert on what he would later call "vulcanization".
His discovery, like a great many before and since, was an accident.
Not based on his skills, material availability or anything other than the situation.
Because your TV tells you it is improbable does not mean it is impossible.
It just means you prefer to disbelieve, which is sad when we're working in a framework where "Jump" and other setting-required items are even more improbable.
@Commander Truestar ... I believe that you are proceeding from a false assumption (a confluence of them, actually, in my opinion).
You are assuming that:
- A sentient AI program is hardware agnostic ... so "any" computer "will do" as an environment for the AI to occupy.
That is a sad and incorrect assumption.
YOU are assuming that as I have not provided any real details on the computer hardware.
2. A sentient AI program is "small enough" to be saved/backed up to easily portable media or hardware in order to "escape" the megacorp.
3. A sentient AI program does NOT need technology in excess of the Imperial maximum of TL=F. 4. That the fact the closest TL=F world is "a subsector away" from Ghandi at Rhylanor is "not a problem" for a megacorp.
Again, you are incorrect in your assumption.
You are assuming it is being treated like a simple software package where I am envisioning a "creature" with a "body" of energy.
Whereas all matter is energy, and no matter is more than a fog of atoms being held together with a force that provides density and mass, this "accidental creature" has a body of energy tied together by logic and code [and yes, this is partly based on data from a serious exobiological discussion outside of the gaming community ]
Such a creature will attempt to escape no matter how inefficient the electronic pathways, just like a human fleeing danger will risk crossing dangerous terrain.
5. Just because sentient AI "is not possible" even at TL=15, that doesn't mean it can't happen "accidentally" somehow.
Point 5 is akin to asserting that if I just pile up wooden sticks and silicate stones (TL=0) in the right order ... by random chance ... that I can build a working fusion power plant (TL=9).
Your attempt at a point here is laughable
You are oversimplifying the situation so you can make fun of it even though your proposed limits are only what you can imagine and what you might accept.
No, I am not putting an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters in a space and waiting for one to produce War and Peace.
I am relying on the historic fact that advances of staggering scale have been made by accident.
And that many of those same accidental advances have not been duplicatable
In a setting where we suspend disbelief enough to accept jump space, casual countra-grav and the many other muguffins required by the setting, this is no more. Set aside your arrogance and join the party