• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Less Lethal Weapons

I was thinking the chargeable projectile would be like a paintball round. Short range with something of a spatter effect to absorb the shock. A civilian police riot gun.
 
re
Peer of the Realm
CID # 4547

posted 01-11-2005 13:52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want something a little faster-acting and a little more broadly effective (most folks aren't susceptible - especially those who survived the '70's) than a strobe-induced seizure. And, of course, seizures can be fatal (more often than a stun-gun, anyway
There is a 1981 film Looker where the villians had a light weapon that caused a form of absence seizure similar to being stunned. The weapon would probably be fairly short ranged and be blocked by filtered glasses of some kind
 
Assuming that even works. There are certaionly people (epileptics) that are vulnerable to flashing lights, which seems to be where the idea came from. Crichton used this earlier, in Andromeda Strain.

Another possibility is Green laser light. You'll go flash blind from a green laser without permanant retina damage as long as the power isn't too high.

http://www.laserdazzler.net/

Obviously, the appropriate lenses would nullify this item.
 
Psionic tech could help. An emitter that induces a sleep state might work. Or something that knocks out your ability to maintain your balance.
 
The objective was -less- lethal ...


Shotguns come to mind. Large slow projectiles have a certain amount of flexibility. Especially if you up the size slightly.

Netgun shells. In a 25 or 30 mm shell it should be possible to pack an expanding net projectile. This would have to be much lower powered then normal shotgun shells.

Alternative goo delivery system.

Low velocity rubber bullets with recessed hypodermic action. That or sponge rounds.

Finegrained chemical delivery system, at a pinch something like ground dried capsicum. Sure the range might only be a couple of metres, but having a handful of irritant embedded in your skin can be ... irritating. Also good for temporary blindness.

... and a myriad other options to pack into a smoothbore gun shell.

The smell option isn't a bad one, there are certain nausea inducing chemicals that should act on many people. Starting with your basic tear gas grenade, and going up to the terrifying "Type S grilled cheese sandwich" compound.

Most less lethal options fall down against armor (in some cases light clothing and a hanky). Can anyone think of a weapon that might incapacitate armored troops? Something like goo might work, but that falls down against ablative armour of any type.
 
Well, veltyen, it would depend on how the armor was intended to ablate - if it is designed for laser fire, it might not ablate with goo/glue.

A take on the net idea, though, would be a bola round. Two weights with a heavy duty cord between could conceivably take down an armored suit (aimed at the legs). (And, a monomolecular wire would be something other than "less-than-lethal"!) Also, powered armor could be hit by EMP weapons - no hardening is perfect.
 
Hey, I remember reading an article a few years ago about a Canadian research team that was able to induce hallucinations with magnetic fields. Perhaps there is some way to make that into a stunner?
 
Press the switch that changes it from EMP “stunner” to microwave laser “extra crispy”.

If you want less lethal just turn it around and whack him in the face with the stock until he stops objecting.
 
I recall something about a strobe-stunner. Only effective at less than 1m. Little permanent damage to the retina, overloads the optic nerve (very painful). Flash is too brief to be stopped by reactive filters, too intense to be stopped by anything less than a welding mask.
 
Originally posted by Straybow:
I recall something about a strobe-stunner. Only effective at less than 1m. Little permanent damage to the retina, overloads the optic nerve (very painful). Flash is too brief to be stopped by reactive filters, too intense to be stopped by anything less than a welding mask.
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123012699
New technology 'dazzles' aggressors
051101-F-0000S-012.jpg

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFPN) -- Capt. Drew Goettler demonstrates the Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response, or PHaSR, a non-lethal illumination technology developed by the laboratory's ScorpWorks team. The technology is the first man-portable, non-lethal deterrent weapon intended for protecting troops and controlling hostile crowds. The laser light used in the weapon temporarily impairs aggressors by illuminating or "dazzling" individuals, removing their ability to see the laser source. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Download HiRes



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Story Tools
Printable story E-mail story

Subscribe now

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



by Eva D. Blaylock
Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate Public Affairs

11/2/2005 - KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (AFPN) -- A laser technology weapon will be the first man-portable, non-lethal deterrent weapon intended for protecting troops and controlling hostile crowds.

The weapon, developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Directed Energy Directorate, employs a two-wavelength laser system and is a hand-held, single-operator system for troop and perimeter defense. The laser light used in the weapon temporarily impairs aggressors by illuminating or "dazzling" individuals, removing their ability to see the laser source.

The first two prototypes of the Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response, or PHaSR, were built here last month and delivered to the laboratory's Human Effectiveness Directorate at Brooks City Base, Texas, and the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at Quantico, Va. for testing.

"The future is here with PHaSR," said Capt. Thomas Wegner program manager. Captain Wegner is also the ScorpWorks flight commander within the laser division of the energy directorate here. ScorpWorks is a unit of military scientists and engineers that develops laser system prototypes for AFRL, from beginning concept to product field testing.

The National Institute of Justice recently awarded ScorpWorks $250,000 to make an advanced prototype that will add an eye-safe laser range finder into PHaSR. Systems such as PHaSR have historically been too powerful at close ranges and ineffective but eye-safe at long ranges. The next prototype is planned to include the addition of the eye-safe range finder and is planned for completion in March 2006.

(Courtesy of AFMC News Service)
 
It's possible to have flash blinding devices which have microsecond pulse lengths, but they won't be very useful as a dazzler, because they'll just burn holes in retinas, not dazzle people.
 
Originally posted by Straybow:
Don't know where you'd be likely to run into somebody with a set of them...
Back in the day, onboard any Strategic Air Command aircraft. We had to fly with these things on every so often (for currency) - God forbid you had an iffy connection to the electrical connectors on your helmet. Of course, we also had to fly with big aluminum foil inserts in our windows, and the PLZT goggles came with an eye-patch to wear underneath for the real deal (not for training, since they didn't want to impair your depth perception). You could never be too protected from flash-blindness!
 
Originally posted by Straybow:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />There are flash protective googles rated for nuclear blasts. Can't imagine that the strobe-stunner world be faster/brighter than that.

http://www.fb-111a.net/goggles.html
Don't know where you'd be likely to run into somebody with a set of them... </font>[/QUOTE]You haven't met my players.
 
I would also expect defenses against laser dazzlers to become more common; the military is certainly working on them (current anti-laser coatings rely on blocking specific wavelengths which are useful for lasers. Frequency-agile lasers which can use any wavelength are a big concern).
 
Back
Top