I don't know if that makes the book any more tantalising, but hopefully helps clarify a few of your observations.
Pete,
It most certainly does.
I still consider the Entertainer career presented in the book as padding. Yes, there are some changes to the various tables and whatnot, but those changes could have presented as a template or lens which would be applied to the original career.
Of course the space required by a template/lens instead of a full career write-up wouldn't take up as much space. Padding is not a good thing, especially when you state some of the other submitted materials were left out.
Your description of the sections on Art and Recreation being "modest" may be a case of you and the other authors being modest. While we've been
told that various Darrian art forms exist, Mongoose will be the first, apart from the sole example of flame sculpture, to actually
show us those forms. This is a good thing.
As for the many deckplans and ship designs, those a very good things. We were told about the heralded Darrian TL16 squadron, then we were told it was basically a sham. The first specific Darrian ship design to appear, the TL16 "cruiser" in
RSB, was a sham too. Now we've
finally got some Darrian ships to mull over.
I, for one, am looking forward to the 400 dTon far trader you mentioned. The Confederation is "plugged" into to only one jump1 Main and the Sword Worlds sits astride that. Any "foreign" trade the Darrians engage in must be carried by vessels which can jump more than one parsec and, while canon has many examples of vessels which can do that, none of those vessels are
Darrian. Again, we now have a selection of Darrian ships to mull over.
And I'm sure that 400 dTon far trader which is
Better armoured for trade into risky areas is made to order for travelling in the
Foreven Sector just next door.
Your preview has tipped the balance from "Meh" to "Interesting". Instead of getting the book "sooner or later", I'll now ask my FLGS to order it.
Isn't it amazing what a partial table of contents and a partial index can do? Makes me wonder if tables of content and index pages should be part of previews, don't you agree?
Regards,
Bill
P.S. Artwork always gets mentioned in these threads, but artwork has never been high on my list on concerns. First, I don't consider "artwork" to be "rules". That is a picture, rather than a schematic or a map, isn't going to tell me anything of importance.
Second, artists have their own concerns apart from writers. Art needs to be judged on it's own and not whether it adheres to a written description. For art, the written description is where the artist
begins, it is not meant to be a constraint.
Schematics and maps are another matter entirely.
All this being said, there is one things which I dislike about the use art and that is when art is used as
deliberate padding. While a full page piece is nice, something actually useful could have been there instead.