captainjack
SOC-13
My numbers are for stars, not systems. Given the large number of binary stellar systems, the number of stars should be divided by ~1.5 to yield the number of systems. (So at least 2/3 of systems should be binary+; some estimates are higher -- 75%--if you believe that, multiply the number of systems by .89 and increase the Density by 12%).
Here's the revised chart:
Distance..Systems..Density (Cu Parsecs/System)
15LY........35....11.77
20LY.......111...13.07
30LY.......184...17.67
40LY.......381...20.29
50LY.......665...22.7
I see the difference, and don't know for sure which he was referencing -but I suspect it may have been just stars.
In any case, I'm confused about the numbers above am I doing the math wrong ?
Heres my prob: taking 20Ly as = 6 parsec/hexes. one gets 216 cubic parsecs in a 20 LY cube around Sol.....your table notes 111 systems, which is about 1.9 CParsecs per system. Am I misreading your table ?
Interestingly, in any case, 111 systems , presented as a 2d map, would collapse onto a 2d array of 36 square parsecs - for close to 3 sytems per Cparsec, (or hex in traveller).