• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Sector-wide Tukera subsidiaries

rancke

Absent Friend
In TTA we see the logos for Tukera Lines and for Akerut, a subsector-wide Tukera subsidiary. They are quite similar, the main difference being that Tukera has three triangular "fins" and Akerut only has one.

I have decided that the other subsector-wide subsidiaries have logos identical to that of Akerut except that the colors differ (Unfortunately we get no hint of the colors used by Tukera and Akerut). And then I got to speculating if there are any Tukera subsidiaries with two triangles in their logos?

The problem I run into is that Tukera and the subsector subsidiaries do complementary business: Tukera runs liners between major worlds and the subsidiaries run feeder lines between minor and major worlds. A sector-wide subsidiary that ran liners between major worlds would compete directly with Tukera. Would that be a problem? Perhaps competing with yourself could have advantages?

Anyway, assuming that a sector-wide subsidiary wouldn't be allowed to run passenger liners, what would they be doing instead?

(Note that I'm not saying that sector-wide subsidiaries must necessarily exist. I'm asking, IF they exist, what would be their business model?)

Or could there be a reason why some of the subsector subsidiaries were allowed two triangles in their logos? Seniority, performance, different company structure? Akerut is a wholly-owned subsidiary. Could there be subsidiaries that have more diversified stock ownership?


Hans
 
actually it could be like the airlines, the parent company may work the Premium and mid range business well as handling territorial (sector or sub-sector) transfers wile the Sector Subsidiaries work as mid cost carriers who dabble in Premium and Low Cost and do Sub-sector transfers, then the sub-sector likes work the low and middle cost markets, because they are technically independent of each other they can lock out other companies wile being able to say they have enough compatision to the regulator especially when you throw in some local joint venture Sub-sector and interface lines.
 
Back
Top