• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Stealthy Shapes

If you look at the design of current-era "stelth" aircraft, you will notice that they are all flat panels and large angles - even the cockpit glass.

Current era radar works on the physical return of reflected radio and micro waves from the target back to the receiver, located at approximately the same place as the emitter. Rounded objects, which are at a micro-level just a series of small flat spots jointed together with large angles, are actually very good at reurning reflected signals at any angle. You get the best return from any surface that is at right-angles to the receiver/emitter combo.

Stealth aircraft are built the way they are to purposefully reflect incoming emissions to a direction such that there is a very low return to the receiver. Other tricks with help diminish return are radio-transparent material, like carbon-fibers, and radar absorbing materials, which prevent reflection to some degree.

Since stealth aircraft are intended on approaching thier targets directly, their lowest cross-sectional area is from directly in front. This cross section also presents the most obtuse angles for a radar signal to reflect off of. Finally, all of the "hard" objects, like engines and ordinance, are tucked inside and to the rear of the craft, behind all of the non-right-angle-reflective and radar absorbing materials in the front, as much as possible.

If Traveller ships used radar or radar-like technologies, a needle shape from the most direct front approach would be the ideal stealth shape. Cylinders, hemispheres and spheres will always present at least a portion of their cross section at right angles to the emitter/receiver, and a significant portion is close enough to a right angle to provide a good return off a strictly line-of-sight sensor system like radar.

Obviously, radar is not the only detection method. Heat will likely be the biggest factor in ship detection, with radio and microwave emissions being a secondary consideration in a space setting.

I'm not sure stealth is even really worth discussing - OTOH, if they aren't looking for you when you are, you become effectively invisible.
 
... and radar absorbing materials, which prevent reflection to some degree.

I have no idea what ultimately became of the project (secret and all of that), but I know a research chemist who was working on developing a paint that would react with incoming radar to alter its wavelength. This would allow an inner layer to absorb it and the 'reflected signature' would no longer match the transmitter and receiver.

A possible defense against active radar (like a homing missile).
 
DGP's Grand Survey includes densitometers, and GC is CT.

Grand Survey did not make the Classic Traveller CD, the supposed compilation of all things 'official' for Classic Traveller.

Even if GS is Classic Traveller, that does not support the earlier claim (not by you) that the densitometer is "the most-used ship-ship detector", it would only make it 'a possible ship detector'. I think that the bulk of CT material supports radar as the 'queen of detection' in space.
 
Last edited:
Grand Survey did not make the Classic Traveller CD, the supposed compilation of all things 'official' for Classic Traveller.

Wasn't it just "all things official" that GDW published, only?

it may have been accepted canon, but it probably would have been expensive to include all the third-party products that were canonical.

Happy Travelling!
 
Wasn't it just "all things official" that GDW published, only?

it may have been accepted canon, but it probably would have been expensive to include all the third-party products that were canonical.

Happy Travelling!

Marc's FFE site originally had a Third Party CD listed as "in progress". It is no longer listed - whatever that means. Some work was reportedly 'decannonized' by Marc, I just never cared enough to remember which items are no longer 'official'.
 
Grand Survey is actually not a bad investment - it integrates DGP's Universal Task Profile into CT. The EMS array is introduced, as are densitometers. According to GS, densitometers will detect a grav field at up to planetary range - but at planetary range it will only be located to a precision of 1km. So you'll know its coming but can't target it without a BIG meson gun. If its closer than 500km then your resolution is much better - enough to target with.
 
Last edited:
Grand Survey, actually.
*sigh*

The years pile on, the brain fades . . . :p

Thanks for catching that.
Grand Survey did not make the Classic Traveller CD, the supposed compilation of all things 'official' for Classic Traveller.
GS was a DGP title, not GDW, so I don't think MWM owns the rights to publish it. It's a shame, really.
Even if GS is Classic Traveller, that does not support the earlier claim (not by you) that the densitometer is "the most-used ship-ship detector", it would only make it 'a possible ship detector'. I think that the bulk of CT material supports radar as the 'queen of detection' in space.
Of the three sensor types listed in GS, the one listed for all ships is EMS sensors - densitometers and neutrino sensors are listed for military and scout ships, with densitometers also available on seekers and other belter craft.
 
Y'all are forgetting one of the biggest gains coming from forbidding stealth in Traveller.

The Vargr now have an excuse for painting their ships the way they do. Starship bling, if you will.
 
Back
Top