AnotherDilbert
SOC-14 1K
If I had played with an "alternate" rule like that I would let it stand, rather than retcon my Universe.
Sylea Battleship
- Thread starter Garnfellow
- Start date
Is this an acceptable way to regress the Sylea back to its theoretical TL 14 antecedent class?
I basically dropped the TL 15 components to 14 and then adjusted other elements so the tonnage balanced. The TL 14 spinal and powerplant were larger, so were offset by reducing the size of the large meson guns (and forgoing their advantages) and having less cargo space:
I basically dropped the TL 15 components to 14 and then adjusted other elements so the tonnage balanced. The TL 14 spinal and powerplant were larger, so were offset by reducing the size of the large meson guns (and forgoing their advantages) and having less cargo space:
| TL 15 Features | TL 14 Features | TL 15 Tons | TL 14 Tons | ||
| Armor | Bonded Superdense | 15 points | 14 points | 25,000 | 23,333 |
| Power Plant | Rating 6-15 | Rating 6-14 | 7,500 | 10,000 | |
| Weapons | Spinal Mount | Type D-15 (540 damage, Penetration rating V) | Type D-14 (495 damage, Penetration rating V) | 8,400 | 11,200 |
| Bays | 50 x Large Meson Gun-14 (Accurate, High Yield) | 50 x Large Meson Gun-14 | 5,050 | 3,050 | |
| Cargo | 5,398.4 tons | 3,765.1 tons | 5398.4 | 3,765.1 | |
| 5,1348.4 | 5,1348.4 |
Xerxeskingofking
SOC-13
off the top of my head, I cant see any faults with that approach.
AnotherDilbert
SOC-14 1K
Agreed.
