• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Type 45 Destroyer

Once it broke the ships went under, usually in a very few minutes. Loss of all cargo and ALL crew. This problem was eventually corrected, but not before enormous loss of life and cargo had occurred.


Bob,

The Discovery Channel is worse than the Hitler... err... History Channel sometimes. ;)

A few Liberty Ships did break in half. Out of the 2500+ built, less than 20 broke in two and the none of those crews were completely lost. It happened, but at no where near the level your TV claimed.

As AT pointed out, this more a result of the welding 'learning curve' than anything else.

Your ideas about 'rushed' construction and designs is spot on. The US had a similar merchant shipping construction program in WW1 that produced incrediably bad ships, many with wooden hulls that quickly rotted or otherwise failed.


Have fun,
Bill
 
I seem to remember that during WWII, a yard did a onetime fast build of a victory ship. They completed the ship start to finish in less than 5 days.
This was by workers that were very experienced and an extremely well
orchestrated assembly plan.
 
One consideration to take into account while considering building time for ships/starships is their purpose...

I've read example of building time for bulk and tankers in this tread. However, without oversimplifying, a bulk or tanker is a quite simple ship: hold/tank, engine, accomodations, bridge with off-the-shelf components requiring only minimal integration...

A warship on the other hand is crammed with complex system: sensors, weapons, computers... While even the military tend to rely more and more on off-the-shelf stuff those days, integration is a major time consuming problem.

I've been remotely (I mean: I sail the ships, I don't build them) involved with the Capabilities Upgrade Program of Belgian Navy Mine Hunters, and the tuning of the (relatively simple compared to a fregate) combat system (integrating sonar, radar, electronic charts system, ROVs... in one single computer system) took over a year.

An other factor influencing building time is the place of the ship in its classe. The first one is a lot more complicated to build than the following ones. If I reckon correctly, GURPS Vehicle (a non Traveller book, but which served as background for GURPS Traveller starship design system) provided rules for building of prototypes/small series/large series... I'll try to dig them up.
 
'Daring' (First Type 45):

  • First steel cut: March 2003
  • Launched: February 2006
  • Expected in service: 2009

Maybe 3.3 years isn't that unrealistic, after all...
 
OTOH it was a BELGIAN Minehunter. So a lot of time got wasted telling everyone that you are "Belgian, NOT French", having a little bit of civil war between Flames and Wallones and afterwards group-testings of the various beers and waffles.

Had that been a GERMAN Minehunter, it would have been ready in twice the time, worked perfectly on calm seas with a temperature between 16 and 16.5 degrees Celsius and would have embarked two counselors to talk the Engineers and Command Crew out of trying to shell the contractors. Who would have joined the crew faster than a certain GSD Lieutenant fell for McLean and his gang.
 
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the break-up of liberty ships was not the result of being built “too fast” or of “poor design”. I thought that welding ships (instead of riveting plates) was a new technology and most of the failures happened at the start of the process – part of the ‘how to’ learning curve of any new technology. The other big problem was that many of the workers had no experience in either welding or shipbuilding (the Rosie the Riveter era).

The lesson is not to buy one of the first starships produced by a TL 7 world that was recently rediscovered and has JUST completed the leap to TL 9 (at least not without a VERY GOOD engineer).


“Aye captain, I’ve finished cabling the sections together. I’ll just stretch my legs with a short EVA to weld those bulkheads back together. Try to keep her nice and steady.”

Welding ships (at least warships) was IIRC a late 1920s concept. And even then they still used some riveting initially "just to be sure". I.e the amount of welding in the post WWI german light cruisers went from less than 30 percent to completely welded during the time, increasing with each ship group layed down.
 
Had that been a GERMAN Minehunter, it would have been ready in twice the time, worked perfectly on calm seas with a temperature between 16 and 16.5 degrees Celsius and would have embarked two counselors to talk the Engineers and Command Crew out of trying to shell the contractors. Who would have joined the crew faster than a certain GSD Lieutenant fell for McLean and his gang.

Actually, the ROVs are german-build. And work perfectly well with less than 1 knot stream... :(
 
'Daring' (First Type 45):

  • First steel cut: March 2003
  • Launched: February 2006
  • Expected in service: 2009

Maybe 3.3 years isn't that unrealistic, after all...
According to the latest (British) National Audit Office (NAO) report, the Type 45 Destroyer is 2 Years late, & some £635 Million ($1.2 Billion) over budget..... ;)
 
Back
Top