Intresting...
Has someone tried to "reverse-engineer" a Eber Stutterwarp drive, or are there not enough remnants to do so....?
Certainly, if a 9.3 Lightyear Stutterwarp drive is possible, what research is going on the subject...?
The point that was made in Ranger is that Ebers have a higher tolerance to radiation, which accounts for the fact that their stutterwarp drives go further before fatal discharge. Essentially, the distance is keyed to Eber physiology, which means that humans cannot take advantage of the technology... unless someone was to come up with a radiation-resistant DNAM.
Still, it would be interesting to see the Chinese Arm through the Eber lens (as it were), looking at all of the 9.4 lightyear clusters that the Ebers could have visited... or are still lurking in. One thing in particular is interesting: the Zeta 2 cluster is significantly larger if you measure in 9.4 ly jumps instead of 7.7.
Edited to add:
It's very tempting to look at the Eber's home cluster and not wonder what happened 4,000 years ago. It's like a 4,000 year-old game of 2300, set in the same place with the same rules and a different species.
Also, I wanted to share that my main mapping software is CHview, which I've been using on Windows for years with no issues. It's a basic little application. Rugged, though. There is a 2300AD near star list somewhere (I know, because I have it). I didn't see it on the first page of searching, but I did find this.
Last edited: