I saw this trailer last year, and had wished I could have gone to Japan to see said film on opening day;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBu1cZm4Gqg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBu1cZm4Gqg
I saw this trailer last year, and had wished I could have gone to Japan to see said film on opening day;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBu1cZm4Gqg
I still have difficulties getting past the concept of resurrecting a sunken WWII battleship and converting it to a starship.
Sorry......
I am quite aware of the mythology and history of the name Yamato. But it still has to make sense to me for me to watch a move, or tv show, or read books about it.The reasoning behind resurrecting the Yamato - which is in reality in several pieces, too - lies in the reason behind the name of the ship and the mythology attached to the ship in original Yamato film. It doesn't have to make sense to you it only has to makes sense within the framework of the story behind the ship and the overall arc of the film.
I am quite aware of the mythology and history of the name Yamato. But it still has to make sense to me for me to watch a move, or tv show, or read books about it.
And, really, the battle history of that ship was far from glorious. It fired at its' own airplanes in the Philippine Sea, and only managed to damaged a portion of Taffy3. It did not ever sink an Allied warship. The most important event Yamato was in was its own sinking.
I would be embarrassed to resurrect that old failure of a ship.
One might say that the whole point of the series was a rather positive one: the Yamato was a symbol for the disgrace of the lost war, resurrecting it within the story was a metaphor for the second chance it's nation got after the war. (just like the Yamato got the chance to actually do something useful for a change)
Oh, does anyone else remember the live action TV series version of starblazers they did years ago as "Babylon 5: Crusade"?
One might say that the whole point of the series was a rather positive one: the Yamato was a symbol for the disgrace of the lost war, resurrecting it within the story was a metaphor for the second chance it's nation got after the war. (just like the Yamato got the chance to actually do something useful for a change)
But the point I was trying to make was that it doesn't have to make sense to you - it only has to make sense to the ones who made and appreciate another layer within the movie. It has nothing to do with the real ship's battle record other than the mythology of the name and the spirit of its "last stand". And the Japanese see the event as a last stand in the same way the French feel about Dien Bien Phu or Americans about Little Big Horn. Debacles all, but the stuff of heroic myth when viewed within the context of the culture it belonged to.
I'll give them that, though I don't think ... no, make that I would be surprised if, any Americans saluted the Yamato as it sank.
My problem with the concept is this: why would they try to make a wet-navy ship into a starship? How would they seal it up vs. vacuum, and haven't they realized that the guns can't cover all the firing arcs - i.e. below?
Originally Posted by BillDowns
I still have difficulties getting past the concept of resurrecting a sunken WWII battleship and converting it to a starship.
Sorry......
The reasoning behind resurrecting the Yamato - which is in reality in several pieces, too - lies in the reason behind the name of the ship and the mythology attached to the ship in original Yamato film. It doesn't have to make sense to you it only has to makes sense within the framework of the story behind the ship and the overall arc of the film.
__________________
I'll give them that, though I don't think ... no, make that I would be surprised if, any Americans saluted the Yamato as it sank.
My problem with the concept is this: why would they try to make a wet-navy ship into a starship? How would they seal it up vs. vacuum, and haven't they realized that the guns can't cover all the firing arcs - i.e. below?