• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Some Interesting Military Data

No, it's because the Afghanis have not forgotten of the power of the charge of the 3rd Foot and Mouth Regiment

I have had a couple of threads shut down for remarks like this. I would not like to see this thread shut down. Kindly keep this a somewhat serious discussion of military and near-military information, please.
 
I just found this on Project Gutenberg, since is was posted on May 4, 2015, and it looks quite interesting.The title is Manual for the Solution of Military Ciphers, by Parker Hitt, Captain of Infantry, U. S. A. PRESS OF THE ARMY SERVICE SCHOOLS Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1916

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/48871

That was the predecessor to the Army Command and Staff College.
 
An account of the death during the Battle of Lutzen of Gustavus Adolphus Vasa II, one of the "Great Captains" of military history. It is taken from the following work available at Project Gutenberg, The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 11.

When the King knew that the first battery was taken, he uncovered his head and thanked God, but soon after, learning that the centre had been repulsed, he put himself at the head of the Smaland cavalry and charged the Imperial cuirassiers, the "black lads," with whom he had just before told Stalhaske to grapple. Piccolomini hastened to support the cuirassiers; and the Swedes, being overmatched, retreated without perceiving—the fog having again come over—that they had left the King in the midst of the enemy. A pistol-ball now broke his arm; and as the Duke of Lauenburg was supporting him out of the battle, an Imperial cuirassier came behind him and shot him in the back. He then fell from his horse; and, other cuirassiers coming up, one of them completed the work of death.

It is added on the testimony of a young gentleman named Leubelfing, the son of Colonel Leubelfing, of Nuremberg, and page to the Lord Marshal Crailsham, that being near when the King fell, and seeing that his charger, wounded in the neck, had galloped away, he dismounted and offered him his own horse. Gustavus stretched out his hands to accept the offer; and the page attempted to lift him from the ground, but was unable. In the mean time some cuirassiers, attracted to the spot, demanded who the wounded man was. Leubelfing evaded the question or refused to answer; but the King himself exclaimed, "I am the King of Sweden," when he received four gunshot wounds and two stabs, which quickly released him from the agony of his broken arm, the bone of which had pierced the flesh and protruded. The Imperialist soldiers about the King, each anxious to possess some trophy, had stripped the body to the shirt, and were about to carry it off when a body of Swedish cavalry, charging toward the spot, dispersed them.
 
My father went into action at Monte Cassino aged 18 and in his first engagement bayoneted a German soldier when they ran into each other by surprise in the rubble. He told me he couldn't pull it out (probably stuck in the guy's spine) and the poor German was wriggling on the end of it. His sergeant knocked him out of the way, chambered a round in the rifle and fired allowing the bayonet to be withdrawn - the German solder was naturally killed. Dad said he threw his rifle away and got a tommy gun. He said he would rather have been killed than have to bayonet a man ever again.
 
My father went into action at Monte Cassino aged 18 and in his first engagement bayoneted a German soldier when they ran into each other by surprise in the rubble. He told me he couldn't pull it out (probably stuck in the guy's spine) and the poor German was wriggling on the end of it. His sergeant knocked him out of the way, chambered a round in the rifle and fired allowing the bayonet to be withdrawn - the German solder was naturally killed. Dad said he threw his rifle away and got a tommy gun. He said he would rather have been killed than have to bayonet a man ever again.

One of my uncles was in Patton's 3rd Army. He told me about the death camps he liberated. Well, not much, I was 6 years old at the time he mentioned them.

My first dad, parents divorced when I was 3 years old, was on Corregidor Island in 1941 and part of 1942. He met mom after the war at a USO where she worked. They married and I was born a year later.
 
An interesting assessment of the Plains Indians as fighting men by Major-General Grenville Dodge, commander of the Department of the Missouri in 1865, at the start of the post-Civil War Plains Wars with the Plains Indians. It comes from his book, The Battle of Atlanta and Other Campaigns, Addresses, Etc., available for download from Project Gutenberg.

The Indians of the plains are the best skirmishers in the world. In rapidity of movements, in perfect horsemanship, sudden whirling, protecting the body by clinging to the side of the horse, and rapid movements in open and difficult ground, no trained cavalry in the world can equal them. On foot their ability to hide behind any obstruction, in ravine, along creeks, and under creek and river banks, and in fighting in the open plains or level ground, the faculty to disappear is beyond one's belief except he has experienced it. In skulking and sharpshooting they are adepts, but troops properly instructed are a match for them on foot, and never fail to drive and route them, if they will stand and fight and never retreat except slowly with their faces to them. I have seen several times, when caught in a tight place, bands of Indians held by a few men by holding to ridges and slowly retreating, always using our rifles at every opportunity when an Indian was in range, never wasting a shot on them unless there was a probability of hitting them. The Indians have a mortal fear of such tactics.
 
Nuclear Weapons

For those who like to toss tactical nuclear weapons around, the following unclassified study on the tactical use of atomic bombs might be of interest.

http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll11/id/2104/rec/1021

For a really detailed discussion of nuclear weapon effects, I recommend reading The Effects of Nuclear Weapons by Samuel Glasstone et al.

http://www.abomb1.org/nukeffct/index.html#EONW77

You can also find hard copies on the Internet. If you get one, try for one with the circular slide rule weapon effects calculator with it. Otherwise, be prepared for a fair amount of number crunching on a calculator.
 
I think just about everyone has heard, in some form or the other, of Custer and the Battle of the Little Big Horn. That was not the worst defeat ever suffered by the US Army in its various campaigns against the Indians. The following is the worst, from CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF ENGAGEMENTS
BETWEEN THE REGULAR ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES AND VARIOUS TRIBES OF HOSTILE INDIANS WHICH OCCURRED DURING THE YEARS 1790 to 1898, INCLUSIVE
, by George Webb, courtesy of archives.org. This is not an exhaustive list, but it does give some idea as to what was going on in any given year.

1791 November 4 Near sources of the Miami of the Lakes, and near site of Fort Recovery, Ohio (St. Clair's defeat)—Maj. Gen. Arthur St. Clair; Regiment of Artillerists; 1st Infantry (?) ; 2nd Infantry; 350 Kentucky militiamen, Lt. Col. Oldham, Peter Faulkner's Rifle Company ; cavalry, against a force of 2,000 Miamis, Delawares, Shawanoes, Wyandots, Ottawas, Chippewas, Potawatomis, led by Red Jacket of the Shawanoes, Buck-ong-a-helos of the Delawares, and Simon Girty. Casualties; 632 killed and 264 wounded of a total force of 1,400.

The "Simon Girty" mentioned is an infamous white renegade of the period prior to 1800.

The following combat occurred after the Civil War, and was the only case of a active-duty US Army General being killed by the Indians. Custer was a brevet Major-General during the Civil War, but his Regular Army rank at the time of the Little Big Horn was Lieutenant Colonel.

1873 April 11—20 Lava Beds, Calif. Trs. B, F, G, H. and K, 1st U. S. Cav.; Cos. E, and G, 12th U. S. Infty.; Cos. B, C, and I, 21stU. S. Infty. ; and Bat. A, B, E, G, H, and K, 4th U. S. Artillery; and Indian scouts. Brig. Gen. E. R. S. Canby and Col. A. C. Gillem, 1st U. S. Cav., in command. Gen. E. R. S. Canby killed. Soldiers killed, 6. Citizens killed, 1. Lieut. Walter Sherwood, 21st U. S. Infty., wounded April 11; and Lieut. C. P. Eagen, 12th U. S. Infty., wounded April 15. Soldiers wounded, 13. Citizens wounded, 2.

The 4th U.S. Artillery batteries were mainly serving as infantry, not as artillery. Canby's death occurred during a parley with the Modoc group led by Captain Jack in an effort to get the Modocs to surrender.
 
I haven't been able to find it, but years ago I saw a web site deailing the history of the Comanche. Some of my ancestors.

One part of it was a photocopied and translated letter from the Spanish military commander in Tejas, to the Viceroy in Havanna, Cuba. The letter begged for infantry and cavalry replacements.

The Viceroy replied back and asked basically 'what happened to the ones I sent you last year ?'.

The military commander said they had all been captured or killed. When they went out chasing the Comanche, they would split up, his men split up to follow them, then the Comanche would reform and attack the small groups of soldiers and cavalry.

So he needed the replacements to get back the horses the Comanche had taken the year before.
 
Friend of mine bayoneted a Cuban on Grenada. It still has a function, although arguably things have gone wrong if you have to use them.
 
I came across this comment in the US Army WW2 history of Quartermaster Operations Against Japan while preparing material for the World War 2 class that I am presently teaching. Comments about the problem of differing rail gauges also show up in the official Australian histories.

During its period of exclusive responsibility for transportation activities, the QMC busied itself with plans for the military utilization of the Australian railway system. That system was in general incapable of swift distribution of supplies. It had originally been built and developed by the six Australian states to serve state rather than national needs. This fact accounted for the system's most serious shortcoming—five different gauges. These varying gauges made long-distance shipments impossible without unloading and reloading, occasionally three or four times. Page 49

Could any of our Australian friends let me know if this situation still exists, or have the Australian railways standardized on the 4 foot 8.5 inch gauge?
 
Last edited:
Yes - I saw something years ago about the confused situation with Australian railroads in the 1930s & 40s.

I would definitely like to get a good picture of which lines were which gauge, along with maps showing where they ran.

Since the 1950s I do know there has been a concerted effort to rationalize ans standardize the gauges, but I'm not sure if they have completed that or not.
 
Yes - I saw something years ago about the confused situation with Australian railroads in the 1930s & 40s.

I would definitely like to get a good picture of which lines were which gauge, along with maps showing where they ran.

Since the 1950s I do know there has been a concerted effort to rationalize ans standardize the gauges, but I'm not sure if they have completed that or not.

The official Australian history AUSTRALIA IN THE WAR OF 1939-1945, SERIES FOUR, CIVIL, VOLUME III, WAR ECONOMY, 1939-1942 has the map for the World War 2 period in Chapter 12, on page 401.

You can find it at this website.
https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/RCDIG1070215/
 
I came across this comment in the US Army WW2 history of Quartermaster Operations Against Japan while preparing material for the World War 2 class that I am presently teaching. Comments about the problem of differing rail gauges also show up in the official Australian histories.



Could any of our Australian friends let me know if this situation still exists, or have the Australian railways standardized on the 4 foot 8.5 inch gauge?

You want a study in confused gauging affecting rail transport, the American Civil War on both sides had SERIOUS gauge issues, on a continental scale.
 
Last edited:
From comments I've seen on MBTs and rail infrastructure, tunnels, bridges and gauges can limit the size of tanks that can be placed on rail cars, so transportation of any largish sized equipment should be carefully scouted out in advance.
 
Right, the apocryphal story is that Russian MBTs are sized to go through older Russian tunnels, although I have read some conflicting articles saying that is an old saw and not true.

For rail, besides the sheer clearance of the tank itself, the main issue is the car itself- both number of axles, the more axles the more the weight is spread around and not pressing on the rail (25 tons or less is optimal but US Class I railroads can handle more- mostly), and the deck of the car itself. Something like only 400+ cars can handle M1s, as I recall.

train_tanksloaded_2_sm.jpg
 
I came across this comment in the US Army WW2 history of Quartermaster Operations Against Japan while preparing material for the World War 2 class that I am presently teaching. Comments about the problem of differing rail gauges also show up in the official Australian histories.



Could any of our Australian friends let me know if this situation still exists, or have the Australian railways standardized on the 4 foot 8.5 inch gauge?

Some lines are still non-standard. The wiki article on "Rail Gauge in Australia has a photo with the caption
Dual gauge tracks in Wallaroo, South Australia. The outer rail on the right is for Broad Gauge (5 ft 3 in (1,600 mm)), the inner rail is for standard gauge. The corridor was dual gauged by Australian National in the early 1980s. This is a low speed line.
640px-Wallaroo-dual-gauge-railway-0855.jpg


And a drawing:
Triple gauge used in the station yards at Gladstone & Peterborough in South Australia
Triple_Gauge_Australia.jpg
 
Back
Top