Based on the Referee's Notes on p. 3, probably not (it's not in the ship's locker, and the allowed equipment sources don't include robots).
The scenario explicitly uses the insidious atmosphere as a hard time limit. If a robot is allowed, it shouldn't have any greater durability than a Vacc Suit in that environment.
But this mostly depends on the context. If it's a narrative exploration using a single character, why not? It provides a "Star Trek 'Red Shirt'" expendable NPC to use to demonstrate the danger of the situation without killing off the protagonist. If it's an accessory for a PC party you're refereeing through the scenario, I'd say no. At best, I'd allow something like a current-day commercial-off-the-shelf quadcopter drone (maybe antigrav for the SciFi effect), or a semi-autonomous RC car (but tracked) with a camera, that'd last 1D+2 hours* before succumbing to the atmosphere. Be sure to account for line-of-sight issues for telemetry.
This is largely a matter of changed technology assumptions since DA1 was published. These days, of course you'd have bots and drones and cubesats stacked up in the ship's locker -- they're small, and cheap enough to almost be expendable. In 1980? Not so much. Why would an ordinary scoutship need Star Wars droids?
*maybe (2D/2)+2 hours, so the middle values are more likely?