Condottiere
SOC-14 5K
Some bears are smarter than average.
Though I'd be more worried about a cybernetic trash panda with a fondness for ordnance.
Though I'd be more worried about a cybernetic trash panda with a fondness for ordnance.
Some bears are smarter than average.
Though I'd be more worried about a cybernetic trash panda with a fondness for ordnance.
If a multi-passenger vehicle at minimal cost is what's required, I'd suggest something like the M 274 Mechanical Mule then.
Add a similar unpowered trailer to haul "stuff" as necessary.
It's compact, minimal, low cost, and very adaptable to various equipment loadouts. For poor environments, add a pressurized tent-like enclosure that fits over the platform.
IMTU the Scouts have an A2 variant in their fleet as a standard asset. For narrative economy, it could be a canon A2, but IMTU it's different....
I would design for an assumption of 3-man teams, and retain the Type S 3-4 ton mission base package/trailer for mission tailoring and multi-week support.
The ship dumps off the ATV, team, and 1 or more base packages, then moves on to drop another ATV/team/base.
Which brings us to the ship- obviously Type S, even stripped to a Seeker and double bunking everyone, is not going to be an effective expeditionary transport.
I think there is such a ship- the A2 Far Trader.
It would need to be J-2 2-G standard as per the Type S, right in the Scout's wheelhouse for operational requirements.
Using the CT version (later ones have more cargo), we have 42 tons of space, which could carry 2-3 ATVs and 3 base packages minimum.
The stateroom situation can allow for 7 mission specialists, or more if double bunking, and we have 4 low berths for medical emergencies or a form of expeditionary frozen watch if it is a long range mission.
So, that's more like my visualization of the OP's expeditionary vehicles.
Please look it all over and comment, if it looks good I'll do up the standard scout vehicles.
...
...