• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Hints on Ship Floorplan Drawing?

the deckplan i am working on have a total of 570000 squares (2 by 2 meter) and of those 358000 are fuel. so the fueldecks will be boring
 
Oh and, 1200 DPI?!! Really?!! I usually find 300dpi is easily adequate, going down to 150 DPI if I'm pushed for memory.

Crow

Scarecrow,

Do you ever plan to even think about having your plans published?

If you're not using a vector format, you need to have the final version at 1,200 dpi. Which means your working version should be at least 2,400 dpi, preferably 4,800 dpi. Then you can use Photoshop or whatever drawing app you use to shrink the image down to 300 dpi for printing at home or whatever the publisher wants for printing professionally.

I've seen a lot of very crappy *printed* documents that looked absolutely wonderful on my computer. I've even written/drawn some of them. :(
 
Scarecrow,

Do you ever plan to even think about having your plans published?

Not my plans, no but all the illustrations I've ever had published were 300dpi and they looked fine.

I've not made any plans for a long time but the last ones I did used a combination of Studio MAX or Maya and Photoshop.

Crow
 
If you're not using a vector format, you need to have the final version at 1,200 dpi. Which means your working version should be at least 2,400 dpi, preferably 4,800 dpi. Then you can use Photoshop or whatever drawing app you use to shrink the image down to 300 dpi for printing at home or whatever the publisher wants for printing professionally.

I doubt many people would often need pics at more than 300dpi. Editing a full page @4800dpi would give most computers a heart attack!
 
I doubt many people would often need pics at more than 300dpi. Editing a full page @4800dpi would give most computers a heart attack!

I will agree that *most* people don't need this. However, my suggestion is that if you ever want to have the deck plans published, you need to do this in a larger format. Or do this in a vector format.
 
Scarecrow,

Do you ever plan to even think about having your plans published?

If you're not using a vector format, you need to have the final version at 1,200 dpi. Which means your working version should be at least 2,400 dpi, preferably 4,800 dpi. Then you can use Photoshop or whatever drawing app you use to shrink the image down to 300 dpi for printing at home or whatever the publisher wants for printing professionally.

I've seen a lot of very crappy *printed* documents that looked absolutely wonderful on my computer. I've even written/drawn some of them. :(

I used to be a Graphic Designer/Typographer for a couple of print shops, and 300dpi was what we used for 98% of what we output and printed. I can't think of hardly anything that "requires" as high as 1200dpi.
 
What programs do people use for drawing deck plans?

Does anybody use Campaign Cartographer to do this?

Some of mine in the gallery were done with CC2
The rest are done in Sketchup as 3D files, then printed to PNG, then tweaked in GIFconverter.
 
What programs do people use for drawing deck plans?

Does anybody use Campaign Cartographer to do this?

MS Paint.

Not necessarily saying I'd recommend it, but it's what I've used for most of the plans I've made, and it does have an elegant simplicity and a very shallow learning curve. Once upon a time it was all I had, and it's been a long time since I've found time to draw...
 
The very same company (ProFantasy) also produces the science-fiction-specialised Cosmographer.

Which is pretty much just a set of sybols and templates for drawing deck plans and star maps. They do include Taveller stuff also which is a big plus, but I don't know how to use it yet. Help would be appreciated.
 
The very same company (ProFantasy) also produces the science-fiction-specialised Cosmographer.

Which requires CC2 or CC3 (depending upon which edition of Cosmo).

DT: PM me to arrange a skype or G+ conference time, and I can walk you through the process.
 
Back
Top