Soooo....
Where does IBIS fit into this game...?
Riik
IBIS as opposed to IRIS AFAIK was something from the older White Dwarf mags.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, and I probably am on this count.

Soooo....
Where does IBIS fit into this game...?
Riik
IBIS as opposed to IRIS AFAIK was something from the older White Dwarf mags.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, and I probably am on this count.![]()
Uh, no...
IBIS was introduced in an early copy of "The Dragon" magazine. I think number 37. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I sit corrected (in front of my computer). Issue 35. I knew it was one of the thirties issue...
So, where does IBIS compare to IRIS in the OTU?
Or does it?
Riik
The 3I canonically maintains two Psionics Institutes. Do with that what you might, the OTU 3I has its own psionics. Some of them work for INI.While this is wandering from the OP (apologies), I have never cared for the "of course, the Imperium has its own sekrit psionics capabilities" line. It sounds as reasonable to me as, "naturally the Vatican is obliged to maintain its own elite corps of Satanists..."
While this is wandering from the OP (apologies), I have never cared for the "of course, the Imperium has its own sekrit psionics capabilities" line. It sounds as reasonable to me as, "naturally the Vatican is obliged to maintain its own elite corps of Satanists..." To me, Imperial anti-psionicism is more interesting as a bedrock cultural value, not a technical hiccup they need to work around to compete with their neighbors.
Hans - IMTU -- as in RW -- "value" and "usefulness" are not objective properties, but aspects of cultures.
Your point eludes me.
Aramis - I wasn't contesting its canonicity, just stating my dislike for it. Perhaps if I knew of some Cold War era CIA-run think tanks based on & dedicated to Maoist theory, I'd swallow it better.
Hans - IMTU -- as in RW -- "value" and "usefulness" are not objective properties, but aspects of cultures.