daryen
SOC-14 1K
I am in no way saying my culture is good. And, again, I am not comparing cultures here. I am simply saying that slavery (and murder and rape and child sacrifice) is wrong.You can only judge another culture as evil if you consider your own to be good and your moral code to be superior to theirs, have you spotted where this falls down yet? The self righteous view of superior morality is evil in and of itself because it provides justification for the atrocities you will commit in the name of your morality.
Yes. But it still gets back to the point that if slavery (and murder and rape and child sacrifice) was not wrong at some point, then, really, it isn't wrong now. It may be unaccepted to some, but that still means it is intrinsically not wrong. (Whether that is because it is intrinsically right, or there is no "intrisics" to anything doesn't matter.) To be honest, this discussion is making me feel like I am some kind of weirdo of sticking to the point saying that slavery is wrong. Mostly at this point I am just very confused.Has it occurred to you that the "correct" answer ... is that neither party in your question has a monopoly on being correct?
Let me give what is hopefully not a controversial analogy. When looking back at very old cultures, they believed that magic was endemic and permeated everything in their lives. You have to understand that, even though *you* don't believe in magic, they sure did. From that understanding, you then have a better chance at grasping what their actions meant and why they did things they did. But, even when you look at things that way, you still understanding that magic doesn't exist now, and didn't exist back then. It is possible to do both of those things: acknowledge that they believed in magic and "used" it in their daily lives and yet still understand that magic isn't real despite what they believed.
In the same way, saying that slavery is wrong is not to say they agreed with that position. They operated on the understanding that slavery was just a part of life and something they accepted, or at least acknowledged. It is important to understand what they believed and how they applied that into their lives. But giving that allowance and using that knowledge to better understand their lives doesn't change that slavery is wrong now and was wrong then. I am not viewing them or expecting them to operate by how I think they should have. Even for other modern cultures, I don't expect them to live life by my codes and morals. It is important to understand what they believe in order to understand what they do, to be able to relate to them, and have any chance to predict what they might do. So, if a culture has integrated slavery into its fiber, then that has to be understood in the context of their culture and what they believe. But that still doesn't make slavery not wrong.
In the 1248 Spinward States, one of the minor powers (the Jewell Covenant) is all about exactly this. Their society was fused between Regency and Zhodani and became focused on expanding psionics to the greatest degree possible. The fun thing about it is that it was intentionally set up so that it could be as utopian or distopian as the referee desired. They could be on the way to "the singularity", or to tranhumanism, or to a hive mind, or to psionic cult. Or some combination of all of them.Per-Zho's I was running a future campaign set 75 years after the events of 1248, some of the material has been uploaded to the wiki; but I remember having discussions with Don at the time, iirc he was writing the Zho book for MgT1 then. He said, and that Marc agreed, I think, everyone would be psionic in the future, something like that (which was statistically supported, I think, running the numbers).
Of course the Proles don't live in fear. How can they? Especially since they are all so profoundly happy!Clearly the majority of Zhodani are fine with the situation and don’t live in fear.