• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Marc W Miller Interview June 27th, 2022

Great interview. I love this bit:

[This] hobby of tabletop games . . . it’s just about the best hobby in the world. I mean it’s affordable, it creates relationships with people that last a lifetime, it’s enjoyable, it challenges your mind and it’s a hidden secret because not enough people understand how much fun this can be or how much fun this is.
 
after reading the interview, I feel that I have a better understanding of the Traveller Universe as a whole. I really enjoyed the history of Traveller and how it has changed and grown over the years. and being able to 'see' his and others thoughts of how they see Traveller has helped me to see the game in a new light, which is a very refreshing thing.
 
It's interesting to note that En Garde! was intended to be "Generate PCs, play them one evening, then move on to new ones next session." And Classic Traveller, 2 years later, seems well suited for that mode. An adventure or two and on to new characters...
 
It's interesting to note that En Garde! was intended to be "Generate PCs, play them one evening, then move on to new ones next session." And Classic Traveller, 2 years later, seems well suited for that mode. An adventure or two and on to new characters...
Very much a wargame mindset, with the PC being a customized unit figurine/counter. Not surprising given where they (and to be fair, all of the RPG writers at the time) came from.
 
Yes, and I guess the point with respect to Traveller is that there's not much in the way of "progressing" (in terms of skills or attributes) in the pulps (e.g., Dumarest raising his Blade skill from 5 to 6) as there is the continued development of his "character", defined by where he's been, what he's overcome and what he's lost or gained (in terms of knowledge, power, companions, items, etc.).
 
+6 vs unarmored targets w/autorifle would make quick work of most everyone, social finagling vs combat had to be the thing
 
after reading the interview, I feel that I have a better understanding of the Traveller Universe as a whole. I really enjoyed the history of Traveller and how it has changed and grown over the years. and being able to 'see' his and others thoughts of how they see Traveller has helped me to see the game in a new light, which is a very refreshing thing.

Marc's book, Agent of the Imperium, also reveals a bit about how he thinks of the Traveller universe.
 
I read AotI. I really liked seeing the unfolding of the Third Imperium through the eyes of a 'time jumper' from a first, second, and third person perspectives.

the Wafer technology was kind of creepy and interesting at the same time, and Mr. Miller did a great job with the plot and flow of the story. I also liked being able to track where the Agent travelled on Traveller Map.

in a way, I kind of would be interested in a sequel, following the Agent further into the Traveller Timeline.
 
Yes, and I guess the point with respect to Traveller is that there's not much in the way of "progressing" (in terms of skills or attributes) in the pulps (e.g., Dumarest raising his Blade skill from 5 to 6) as there is the continued development of his "character", defined by where he's been, what he's overcome and what he's lost or gained (in terms of knowledge, power, companions, items, etc.).
It's also plausible, for what that's worth.

But personal growth isn't really provided for in the rules. I'm not sure how it could have been at the time, and think it would be difficult to do even in the current world of RPGs. Additional stats for maturity, sanity, introversion/extroversion, empathy, accumulated emotional trauma, and so on? Of course the optimal mental state (in an in-game min-max sense) for a PC may not be a well-balanced individual in an objective sense.
 
It's also plausible, for what that's worth.

But personal growth isn't really provided for in the rules. I'm not sure how it could have been at the time, and think it would be difficult to do even in the current world of RPGs. Additional stats for maturity, sanity, introversion/extroversion, empathy, accumulated emotional trauma, and so on? Of course the optimal mental state (in an in-game min-max sense) for a PC may not be a well-balanced individual in an objective sense.
Yeah, I see no reason for anything in that second paragraph to be anything other than just "the game unfolding".
 
And there is another interview that was posted today.

Interesting remark -- that Marc thinks the original game could have used conflict resolution rules.
T5 now has them in the form of the Personals rules.

I also had no idea that "Kinunir" was pronounced "Kih-nyu-near" (I thought it was "Kinoo-near").
 
Last edited:
Back
Top