• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Metric ton conversion!

Shonner

SOC-14 1K
I'm having a brain fart and need help with something.

What is the formula to convert metric tons to d-tons for Traveller?
 
I'm having a brain fart and need help with something.

What is the formula to convert metric tons to d-tons for Traveller?

There isn't one. Metric tons is weight, d-tons are volume.

If you're thinking of how many cubic meters to a d-ton, it's either 13.5 or 14, depending on what rules you're using.


Hans
 
On a standard Classic Traveller deckplan with a 1.5 grid square, one(1) dT is 2 grid squares horizontally and vertically.

So length x height x width = 1.5x2 x 1.5x2 x 1.5 = 13.5dT

Freelance traveller site has an article discussing mass/dT conversions. From memory 5xdT = mass tonnage.
 
Freelance traveller site has an article discussing mass/dT conversions. From memory 5xdT = mass tonnage.

For a certain average density.

Filling the volume with small pieces of scrap iron would result in more mass-tons per dt.

Leaving the space empty (except for air) would result in fewer mass-tons per dt.
 
On a standard Classic Traveller deckplan with a 1.5 grid square, one(1) dT is 2 grid squares horizontally and vertically.

So length x height x width = 1.5x2 x 1.5x2 x 1.5 = 13.5dT

Freelance traveller site has an article discussing mass/dT conversions. From memory 5xdT = mass tonnage.

Ok. I found some stuff that also uses the 5 metric ton = 1 Traveller d-ton idea. How many d-ton would you say the '60s Enterprise NCC-1701 is? I have the Star Trek plans somewhere. I don't remember seeing metric tonnage listed for them though.

ADDED:
Ok, found it. The Enterprise is 190,000 metric tons. So that is 38,000 d-tons in Traveller. But that is assuming '60s Star Trek ships are made/manufactured the same as Traveller ships? Or we don't concern ourselves with this?

I know this is an old question from 36 years ago. But all my notes from back then were stored on a HP-2000F, with some lost translations on a DEC-20 in FORTRAN 77.
 
Differing technologies, building techniques make a difference I reckon. Trek ships of the TOS era onwards rely on shields as primary defence, no hull armour worth a damn really. They do not use hydrogen fuel for ship power etc etc...
 
Differing technologies, building techniques make a difference I reckon. Trek ships of the TOS era onwards rely on shields as primary defence, no hull armour worth a damn really. They do not use hydrogen fuel for ship power etc etc...

Yep. I was thinking more about the wall/floor/ceiling construction, and the piping.

Also, I notice that ALIEN's USCSS Nostromo is similar in size to the '60s Enterprise, but they list their metric tonnage vastly different. So I know that the Star Trek universe (the Star Fleet universe, technically) and the ALIEN universe are using different ship-building materials and methods.
 
Enterprise NCC-1701 Displacement

Ok. I found some stuff that also uses the 5 metric ton = 1 Traveller d-ton idea. How many d-ton would you say the '60s Enterprise NCC-1701 is? I have the Star Trek plans somewhere. I don't remember seeing metric tonnage listed for them though.

ADDED:
Ok, found it. The Enterprise is 190,000 metric tons. So that is 38,000 d-tons in Traveller. But that is assuming '60s Star Trek ships are made/manufactured the same as Traveller ships? Or we don't concern ourselves with this?

I know this is an old question from 36 years ago. But all my notes from back then were stored on a HP-2000F, with some lost translations on a DEC-20 in FORTRAN 77.


There was a website that analyzed (volumetrically) the sizes of many ships from SciFi (including Star Trek & Star Wars among others) by mathematical approximations.

CotI Thread: http://www.travellerrpg.com/CotI/Discuss/showthread.php?t=31084&highlight=displacement
Website: http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWvolumetrics.html

IIRC, the NCC-1701 came in somewhere between 15,000 and 20,000 dtons, approximately.
 
Ok. I found some stuff that also uses the 5 metric ton = 1 Traveller d-ton idea. How many d-ton would you say the '60s Enterprise NCC-1701 is? I have the Star Trek plans somewhere. I don't remember seeing metric tonnage listed for them though.

ADDED:
Ok, found it. The Enterprise is 190,000 metric tons. So that is 38,000 d-tons in Traveller. But that is assuming '60s Star Trek ships are made/manufactured the same as Traveller ships? Or we don't concern ourselves with this?

I know this is an old question from 36 years ago. But all my notes from back then were stored on a HP-2000F, with some lost translations on a DEC-20 in FORTRAN 77.
Traveller DTons (Displacement Tons, aka Starship Tons) aren't a measure of mass, but of volume ... 14 cubic meters each. (Tho' in TNE, an upper bound for drive calculations is 10 metric tons per DTon.)

190,000 would imply 19,000 Td... except that the enterprise is more dense.

the 211,000 cubic meters, calculated by ST vs SW Volumetrics (Henceforth STvSWV) is 15,089 displacement tons. STvSWV also (in the notes) comments on the density.

The larger volume of the uprated enterprise, as shown on STvSWV, is 234,928 cubic meters. That's 16780Td.

My own rough calculations came to 17KTd on several occasions, and 15.5Ktd on others.

one must be careful in looking at the various size units to understand what the units are.
 
The larger volume of the uprated enterprise, as shown on STvSWV, is 234,928 cubic meters. That's 16780Td.

My own rough calculations came to 17KTd on several occasions, and 15.5Ktd on others.

one must be careful in looking at the various size units to understand what the units are.

I think I remember that post. Bounded box approximations. Those ships tend to look bigger as they are disbursed.
 
Metric tons is weight, d-tons are volume.

Technically speaking, meric tons are mass, not weight, equivalent at 1G.

Than makes me answer that the conversión would depend on the denisty of materilas, so, one dton of pure watr would be 14 metric tons (13.5 in MT), while one of iron would be 7.87 times that.

See that this could have importance if your hold is full of one cargo or another and the drives are given in tons of thust, as in MT pregravitic One Small Step or, IIRC, in some TNE or T4 drives(e.g. HEPLAR) or, in MT to calculate the loaded weight for agility pourposes (and you want added complexity, of course).

If the question was meant about ship's Gross Displacement Tons, each dton would be the equivalent to 14 m3 of volumen for the ship, and ,assuming about 35-50% of it is sumerged (IIRC, not sure about it), to about 5-7 tons of displacement for an ocean going ship.

So, the smallest dreadnough built (España class), that displaced about 16000 metric tons, would be about 2.5-3 kdton in Traveller, while the largest (Yamato), that displaced about 73000 metric tons, would be about 10-14 kdton in Traveller.
 
I think I remember that post. Bounded box approximations. Those ships tend to look bigger as they are disbursed.

I actually worked from the SFTM drawings... and got 17ktd. ± 1000 Td allowing for line, thickness.
 
Back
Top