• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

New Project ( Guess what it is ?)

Meteoric Assault

Marquis de Sharkbait
Admin Award
New Projects ( Guess what they are ?)

I created my Vargr 2d Working armature.... I am sharing this because I have long wanted to have a good depiction of Vargr Combat Armor based off the JTAS 21 Cover... which I believe was by one of the Keith brothers.


Screen%20Shot%202015-10-20%20at%209.38.20%20PM_zpsm7vos0yn.png
 
Last edited:
Hmm a TL 12 fusion powered grav APC with armor 15.

Question: with the Pen of it's weapons 2D and armor 15 does that mean that you would need to have a critical success to penetrate a copy of itself?

Can a Bradley IFV kill another Bradley? I think yes, so perhaps a 3D pen weapon is needed. What are your thoughts, should an APC be able to take on other APC's?

I think our Bradleys can be mounted with an external mount anti armor missile system (HVM) capable of killing MBTs. Perhaps that would be a option for this vehicle a 4 round box launcher for an anti-armor missile system.
 
Hmm a TL 12 fusion powered grav APC with armor 15.

Question: with the Pen of it's weapons 2D and armor 15 does that mean that you would need to have a critical success to penetrate a copy of itself?

Can a Bradley IFV kill another Bradley? I think yes, so perhaps a 3D pen weapon is needed. What are your thoughts, should an APC be able to take on other APC's?

I think our Bradleys can be mounted with an external mount anti armor missile system (HVM) capable of killing MBTs. Perhaps that would be a option for this vehicle a 4 round box launcher for an anti-armor missile system.

I need to annotate 2D ( means 2 x Damage), I should figure out a different shorthand for annotation of the penetration. or at least note it on the sheet.
 
ok "40" "12" "24" and so forth. sorry for the misunderstanding.
What does the D/ mean for the smoke rounds? Perhaps "(4)" to indicate that is it's antipersonnel penetration value.

So one of the mortar plasma rounds hits the top armor of a MBT defeating the 23 AF found there and doing 1/2 of a damage point to everything and everyone in the hit compartment.(10 points of antipersonnel damage).

(I've not read your rules yet, I had to delete my Adobie PDF reader due to it checking for updates every hour and dropping me to desktop out of whatever game I was in at the time. I have not selected a replacement yet, open to getting advise as to a suitable PDF reader.)
 
Last edited:
ok "40" "12" "24" and so forth. sorry for the misunderstanding.
What does the D/ mean for the smoke rounds? Perhaps "(4)" to indicate that is it's antipersonnel penetration value.

So one of the mortar plasma rounds hits the top armor of a MBT defeating the 39 AF found there and doing 1/2 of a damage point to everything and everyone in the hit compartment.(10 points of antipersonnel damage).

(I've not read your rules yet, I had to delete my Adobie PDF reader due to it checking for updates every hour and dropping me to desktop out of whatever game I was in at the time. I have not selected a replacement yet, open to getting advise as to a suitable PDF reader.)

D/ is for the White Phosphorous round which should burn through cloth and and similar armors.

I am going to think more not your mortar plasma round against Armor. (Pause), it was my intention of using the 60mm Plasma Mortar round as a TL 12 anti-personnel weapon. I will revisit the rules again and see if it can be tweek to the fact that there needs to be a nuance for Armor. Now if it was a terminal guidance with an anti-Armor Warhead... Yeah that would work. But, again it is a question of mechanics.

I haven't had an issue with my Adobe reader.
 
Last edited:
Generally I got the impression from the drones or dismounts target designating the targets for terminally guided indirect fire that that was your defensive fire against a direct attack by armor, for if a MBT can see you, you're already dead.

My take on the usage would be:
The VRF gauss in the cupola with computer control and computer linked sensors is your indirect fire defense, the hull mounted VRF gauss gun is your squad support along with the plasma gun for direct attack against dug in troops. the Mortar prepares the battlefield by destroying anti-vehicle weapon systems before you unmask from your cover.

Advise adding a chaff round along with the smoke, so you can defeat radar sensors. and one more item, defensive smoke and chaff launchers

Fan fiction snippet:

"The dismounts had been moving forward for hours carefully checking for any active sensors and monitoring for any transmissions, and were now in place 1.5 klicks from the enemy's front line, 10 klicks in front of us. The drones were aloft 10 klicks back of us and had been there hours and we had an impressive fire plan to neutralize the most dangerous of the spotted emplacements. we had inched forward using terrain to mask our approach, the belly armor plowing the ground in some cases. It was time to go, our tanks were 50 km back of us and were executing their popup maneuvers to start the ball, bright lines of plasma fire scorched their way across the 60 km to the enemy lines in a matter of instants, as our mortars went into their maximum cycle rate and we started moving still nap of the earth but rapidly increasing speed. The fire control computers were updating the fire plan as we moved and additional batteries unmasked to engage the tanks. The dismounts turned on their target designator lasers for the incoming mortars as we broke from nap of the earth and started servicing targets with our plasma guns.

We reentered NOE and landed near the dismounts and fired off the close defense smoke and chaff rounds, the target zone was a mass of smoke and chaff lit by plasma as remaining defenders fired blindly to try to convince us not to enter mk 1 eyeball range.
We had no intention of going in there, their quick reaction force would be heading to this area and it was time to go as the dismounts tumbled in we fired the last of the mortar chaff rounds set to airburst along our retreat path, then it was up and away at top speed weaving from one chaff ball to the next as we tried to avoid the fire from their tanks. we saw a few ruler straight lighting strikes from orbit hitting at their tanks as we disengaged. I guess that was the whole purpose of the attack, get them to unmask their tanks so our ortillary could kill a few, attrition, yes we took some losses as well, but come the day they have no mobile reserve left is when we go in to take and hold the lines."
 
Back
Top