far-trader
SOC-14 10K
I think if I were to do it, and I'm considering it even for the allowed examples (in T20 in this case) there should be some balance.
For example with T20 I think if you want to start prior to age 18 then you won't have as many starting skills, like maybe 2x instead of 4x for the first level skills and no bonus feat until you are 18.
I think I'd also impose an experience penalty, like maybe half all awards prior to 18 years old.
I think even your stats should reflect your youth, maybe reduced Edu and Soc (at least), and perhaps Str and Con if very young.
Anyway I see no problem with most players but there will be those who just want to start younger so they can have more terms and be some uber character. Put a few stumbling blocks like above in the way and that should weed out the "roll-players" from the "role-players".
For example with T20 I think if you want to start prior to age 18 then you won't have as many starting skills, like maybe 2x instead of 4x for the first level skills and no bonus feat until you are 18.
I think I'd also impose an experience penalty, like maybe half all awards prior to 18 years old.
I think even your stats should reflect your youth, maybe reduced Edu and Soc (at least), and perhaps Str and Con if very young.
Anyway I see no problem with most players but there will be those who just want to start younger so they can have more terms and be some uber character. Put a few stumbling blocks like above in the way and that should weed out the "roll-players" from the "role-players".