• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

CT Only: Ref's and Players and GUNS!

And US common law has been all over the place on the weaponness of any knife, and generally, has held that a knife is a weapon that has utility uses, not a tool that has weapon uses...

Care to cite a source on that? There are so many knife statutes in the US that the common law rarely applies.
 
What would UK law say about these?

They have "blade hidden inside a handle that splits in the middle", but it is rrally hard to claim they are "butterfly knives" - and they lack the "release button" of the "lock knife" (despite the "can include multi-tools" part) - in fact, to get at the knife blade you have to open it, then pivot the blade out in an additional action - just the opposite of the "easier to use = deadlier" concept that causes the banning of mechanical-assist knives (switch-blades) or single-motion-opening knives (gravity knives).


http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools
 
Care to cite a source on that? There are so many knife statutes in the US that the common law rarely applies.

Look at the variety of results of police shootings where the officer says, "He had a knife"... And then ignore the ones where it's clear the officer was delusional...
 
Look at the variety of results of police shootings where the officer says, "He had a knife"... And then ignore the ones where it's clear the officer was delusional...

That doesn't support your contention that the common law views a knife as a weapon first. It doesn't even demonstrate that police view knives as weapons first, because it only reflects situations where knives were brandished -- i.e., where knives were used as weapons.
 
That doesn't support your contention that the common law views a knife as a weapon first. It doesn't even demonstrate that police view knives as weapons first, because it only reflects situations where knives were brandished -- i.e., where knives were used as weapons.

It shows the clear bias that the knife, brandished or not (at least if you read enough) was grounds for a justified use of lethal force by the officer.
 
Yes. But that was not your contention.

Since it's not blackletter law, and any non-responsive individual with a knife can be shot by police with relative impunity, it's effectively common law.

Gesturing towards or pulling a coat to reveal a knife is commonly considered a threat to use it.

It's a weapon in the general eyes of US law as I've experienced it.
Including that the federal law relating to knives prohibits teachers from carrying a knife over 2" on their person at work, save for teaching its uses as a tool in appropriate specialized environments. (Source: Anchorage School District Employee Training, 2015.) As in, Felony level violation. Leathermen folding tools explicitly violate the rule.

The presence of the knifeblade is the determinant of weapon.
 
Stupid question time.

I go on holiday to Texas from the UK.

Can I carry?

A Texan comes to the UK - can they carry?

Do you see the issue - the Imperium can make any laws it likes, but frontier worlds have the governmental autonomy to apply their own rules.
 
Stupid question time.


No such thing.

I go on holiday to Texas from the UK. Can I carry?

Get the proper license and you can.

A Texan comes to the UK - can they carry?

There is no license to be had for that because...

Do you see the issue - the Imperium can make any laws it likes, but frontier worlds have the governmental autonomy to apply their own rules.

Exactly. :D
 
Well, there ISN'T any knife carry license in Texas, just concealed handgun.

The implied point is to support the idea that the weapon/LL matrix is an effective starting point, but refs would be well supported by reality to not go by that standard all the time, perhaps blades are illegal but lasers are fine, and make for interesting choices in problem solving, tactical or otherwise.
 
Stupid question time.

I go on holiday to Texas from the UK.

Can I carry?

In Arizona, one of the more liberal gun states, people are free to open carry or concealed carry without any permitting.

But, visiting aliens, can not -- they're wholesale disqualified (barring exemptions for hunting, etc.).

That said, you couldn't be stopped for just carrying, or printing (showing your concealed firearm). But if you were caught, then, you'd get in some kind of trouble.

Dunno what's it's like in the other similarly liberal states. Note, there is no Federal limitation for legal aliens, so it's a state by state issue.
 
Except for purchases, right? You can't buy a firearm unless a citizen or holder of a resident visa.

My understanding is that it's fine for them to purchase, but not to take possession of, a firearm. But, I'm off to check.

BATF has info. And, upon checking, yes, I am correct:

BATF said:
May a nonimmigrant alien who has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa and who falls within an exception, purchase a firearm or ammunition in the United States?

A nonimmigrant alien without residency in any State may not purchase and take possession of a firearm. A nonimmigrant alien may only purchase a firearm through a licensee where the licensee arranges to have the firearm directly exported. A nonimmigrant alien who falls within an exception may, however, purchase and take possession of ammunition.
Note that a non-resident alien may purchase or rent, and receive, a firearm and ammo for a variety of designated reasons...
... A hunting license issued by a state is plenty enough reason for them to be allowed to possess a firearm in the US.
 
Just to be clear

[m;]I'm allowing discussion in this thread of the extant legal state of any nation.[/m;]

No discussion of the political causes of such, please.
Keep it civil and limited to factual matters.

[m;]Once you get to your opinion about said law, you've exceeded the waiver.[/m;]
If you want to discuss the politics, start a parallel thread in the political pulpit. (Moot Members Only.)
 
Back
Top