• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.

The Long Night?

It leaves us with a lot of dead Aslan.
In Soviet Hierate, CAT put YOU in box!

MongoVerse assumption is more sentient intuition as to the correct course of action, or just course, of course, to avoid going off course.

Coarsely speaking.
The first paragraph does imply that there is still something about organic intuition that machine intelligence cannot match when it comes to navigating jump space, but the second paragraph is very clear that the situation is far worse if there isn't at least somebody -- anybody -- around and alert to what is going on. Even if the entire bridge is vacant and being run on automated systems, and the only person awake on the ship is some guy sitting alone in the ship's brig with a strong cup of coffee, that's enough to prevent an additional -4 DM to the jump success from happening.
 
Unlikely, as there is at least one race (Hivers) who have managed to master jump travel despite virtually no aptitude for psionics.

I think, perhaps, it has something to do with the fact that every instance of jump travel is a concrete example of Schodinger's Box in action, and as such it needs a literal observer to complete its function. Without some qualified observer of the phenomenon, the contents of the 'box' (in this case a starship) cannot either collapse into a single defined state (under Copenhagen interpretation) or manifest into its multiple possibilities (under the Many Worlds interpretation). The end result, from the outside universe's point of view, is that the jump fails somehow, quite often catastrophically.

So, what qualifies as an observer? Obviously, humans and other sentient beings do. But how low does it go? Do dogs, cats and lizards qualify? Ants and cockroaches? Divorce attorneys and social media influencers?

Nobody has ever figured that part out for certain, except that standard issue AI's (like robots and ship's computer systems) don't count, as well as most incarnations of the mysterious Essaray. Tech derived from naturally evolved silicon life (Virus) seems to work, although that is small comfort to the rest of us in Charted Space.

At least from a "setting chrome" perspective, it's probably significant that what is seen by a sophont looking directly at jumpspace is affected by the presence of another observer viewing it at the same time (this from the novel).

Jumpspace wants an audience.

A sophisticated audience that can understand the finer points of the performance -- and that takes Navigation skill. The uncultured groundlings in the yard in front of the stage (passengers and other crew) sometimes aren't enough. And Jumpspace hates playing to an empty house...
 
Last edited:
At least from a "setting chrome" perspective, it's probably significant that what is seen by a sophont looking directly at jumpspace is affected by the presence of another observer viewing it at the same time (this from the novel).

Jumpspace wants an audience.

Which is the inverse of the Cordwainer Smith "Instrumentality of Man" universe, in which hyperspace actively tries to kill sophonts, in one way or another (except for space3, but you don't want to go back there again anyhow).
 
The ingame explanation for astrogation might be some random variable that the machine intelligence can't recognize.

But wake sentience smacks of the Forty Kay warp.
 
Nobody has ever figured that part out for certain, except that standard issue AI's (like robots and ship's computer systems) don't count, as well as most incarnations of the mysterious Essaray. Tech derived from naturally evolved silicon life (Virus) seems to work, although that is small comfort to the rest of us in Charted Space.

What's the difference between an AI (either those with positronic brains at TL12, self awareness at TL 14, or tru AI at TL 16) and an evolved silicon life?
 
What's the difference between an AI (either those with positronic brains at TL12, self awareness at TL 14, or tru AI at TL 16) and an evolved silicon life?

and what's the difference between that and organic self-awareness?

From a sort of current technological view AI is generally considered a more limited and specific function vs the more generalized true AI / self awareness. Well, at least that's my understanding of it.

Once something becomes self aware and has a generalized world view that can make abstractions about its own environment, I personally don't see a real difference and the underlying physical strata makes no real difference. Especially as we still have no idea what consciousness even is (lots and lots of fun theories, but all theories. My current favorite is that everything, yes EVERYTHING, may have some level of consciousness. Pantheism all over again :))
 
And the question of exactly what electro-magnetic/chemical/environmental/etc factors an organic brain can sense that the technological AI hasn't been engineered to be able to sense.
 
Chemistry. :rolleyes:

the underlying physical strata may indeed be chemically different, but the idea of self, self-awareness and consciousness may be the same. As previously mentioned, we have no real idea what to be conscious even is.

I am just saying that the end result may be the same regardless of how it got there (I'd dig up my 20+ year old thesis on the ethics of AI but it is way out of date and on a dead hard drive using no longer available software).

Convergent evolution essentially but for the mind rather than the body.
 
Artificial implies that it couldn't occur naturally, but requires another species to intervene and manipulate technology to create that state.
 
Back
Top