Well, you'd need a pair to play around in TNE, too.Originally posted by soloprobe:
I see MOST OF US play ,like we've "GOT A PAIR" and opted for the Dark Imperium.....
Well, you'd need a pair to play around in TNE, too.Originally posted by soloprobe:
I see MOST OF US play ,like we've "GOT A PAIR" and opted for the Dark Imperium.....
And that's what makes such a setting interesting.Originally posted by Baron Saarthuran von Gushiddan:
Sure, we got wars, we got drugs, crime, you name it. But we also beat Polio, went to the moon, and got me mum a new Titanium kneecap. If some jive like the Virus can beat us, then we either had it coming, or were asleep at the switch.
If we as humans in the 57th Century (hypethetically, of course) were to allow that to come about, then the question arises if we even deserve to Rise out of the Ashes.
My own dream is of a Traveller 5K or 10K. A setting far enough in the future to be completely different yet containing familiar yet subtly changed elements.But that's my own personal dream project. Someday I may even sit down and do it.
Amen.Originally posted by Employee 2-4601:
Without darkness there is no light; without the Sherieff of Nottingham there would be no Robin Hood; without the archvillian there would be no superhero.
I did not say that I would nescerily use a personified "evil" in my game either, or even that I would put "good" PCs against "evil" opponents in each and every plot -this isn't D&D - but rather that occasional hard choices and moral considerations, as well as the possibility to "do good" if they wish, and to "do evil" if they wish, would give alot of emotional colour to the PCs, as well as to NPCs and to the plot.Originally posted by Gnusam Netor:
I think the question is only how much contrast you want to have between "evil" and "good" and how personified you want each one of them to be. I sense that the baron does not really want a personified evil for the PCs to fight against. Nor that his PCs only have an agenda set by "good".
I didn't accuse you of anything, i wrote "amen" (as in I-agree-100%-with-that-I-quoted), then I went on to discuss in general on the subject. However, I see why you might have missinterpreted my post, i'll try to correct that.Originally posted by Employee 2-4601:
I did not say that I would nescerily use a personified "evil" in my game either,
I didn't accuse you of anything, i wrote "amen" (as in I-agree-100%-with-that-I-quoted), then I went on to discuss in general on the subject. However, I see why you might have missinterpreted my post, i'll try to correct that. </font>[/QUOTE]No, I did not feel accused or offended - I only wanted to clarify what I said earlier. No need to re-edit your postOriginally posted by Gnusam Netor:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Employee 2-4601:
I did not say that I would nescerily use a personified "evil" in my game either,