What is everyone's view of the Fermi Paradox? In 1950, Enrico Fermi, who built the first nuclear reactor at the University of Chicago, posed the question: Where is everybody?
Unless they're approaching K1, we're unlikely to pick them up, period, by any method other than atmospheric compositions.
gross oversimplification of the math, but a good 1st order approximation...
Currently, our best scopes have trouble with 120 AU 0.25W - Inverse Square law. Our biggest commercial radio is 25 MW...100,000,000 times the power, so around 10,000× the range. so 1.2 1,200,000 AU, or 18.97 LY.
If we posit that V1 and V2 are only at 0.15 W, and the 150 AU value of cutoff from their estimates, it's still under 30 LY, around the average separation of stars in the F, G, and K types
If we accept only FGK as likely star types, they're simply a tiny increase in radio static.
Further, the biggest wattage broadcasters are not unique on channel... so interference is going to render the data unrecoverable. Noise. Louder than normal static.
It's not that they're not out there, it's that
none of them are close enough to pick up with reasonable radio assumptions, and even if we do,
most of the detections will be simply louder noise than usual.
It's entirely possible that a significant fraction of the background radio might actually life all over the place watching broadcast TV.
As for watching I Love Lucy? Proxima is probably too far out to get a good signal.