shadowdragon
SOC-12
as stated in several forums regarding weapons, particularly size and power comparisons, we all know there is no such thing as hydrostatic shock from bullet impacts on human flesh. I recently found this video and cannot understand the side effects of these impacts. shouldn't the bullets go right through without damaging any other part of the test object, and leave just a pair of holes? the banana and the water bottle are particularly confusing....
help? i am trying to come up with realistic damage tables for firearms and this video seems to demolish some of the truths of bullets vs. flesh we all know.
here is the video in question:
google video
help? i am trying to come up with realistic damage tables for firearms and this video seems to demolish some of the truths of bullets vs. flesh we all know.
here is the video in question:
google video