Unless you add generic base values to your model, in which case you get a very strong correletion between volume and value.Either can work with the OTU because there is no direct correlation between the total *volume* of trade and the total *value* of trade.
No, your point is that if it says 100 without specifying whether it is talking about volume or value, then you can choose whichever you prefer. But canon does specify (FT talks about both), and if it didn't, you could choose either, but you would have to choose one, and choosing one would rule out the other.The discussion is about fitting the data to canon. My point was that if a canon number is 100 but canon doesn't specify if it's made up of 10x10 or 5x20 or 2x50 then you can choose which you prefer.
And how do you do that?You'd need enforcing it to be in the interests of the sub-sector Dukes.
The CT model is buy as low as possible, search for a place to sell, sell, hopefully at a profit. This is different from the model for regular trade, which is buy, ship, sell for a regular profit.Yes but the point is the model. The model is buy as low as possible, add shipping costs, sell as high as possible at the other end.
Yes, but the CT trade model doesn't include all possible commodities. To the contrary, it leaves out most luxury items that can be profitably shipped across long distances.Therefore as the base value of the goods limits the range of profitability it also limits the distance. If the maximum possible profit on a commodity in the OTU according to the trading rules is 4100cr then the maximum distance it can be traded profitably is four jumps.
And FT addresses that point. Mostly by admitting that its model breaks down over sufficiently long distances, but it also attempts to alliviate the problem by reducing the volume (but not the value) of trade across long distances.Yes if the base value was higher - because profitable trading distance using the trading rules is determined by the base value.
On the contrary, trade routes and the average volume of ships along them would be established by averages spread across years and decades, so all fluctuations would even out, eliminating the need for die rolls. The model would be buy, ship, sell for a small, but steady profit (or a big profit if you can arrange for a monopoly).It has every connection. Whatever rules you came up with would follow the same pattern - some kind of roll to decide the buy low and sell high based on whatever.
Hans