Timerover51
SOC-14 5K
Cryton, as I have not been able to mine my garage for my 1977 set of LBBs, I found a set online and it is one the way. Thanks for bringing some of the early rules back to mind.
Cryton, as I have not been able to mine my garage for my 1977 set of LBBs, I found a set online and it is one the way. Thanks for bringing some of the early rules back to mind.
You're welcome.
I do not normally rely on the OTU, but IMO, there's more color when the Dukes aren't tied to mapping conventions.
Try this on for size:
Duke of Mora's enfeoffment is:
Count of Daumier is a vassal of Mora, and his enfeoffment is those 6 stars in Star Lane.
- those 6 stars in the upper left corner of Star Lane subsector
- everything in Mora subsector except Natoko, Heroni, Fosey, Byret in the upper left,
- And except Fenl's Green, Palique, Mainz, Pedase, Nexine in the lower right.
- Perhaps he acquired Maitz, Meleto, and that chain over to Pimane by marriage
Likewise Marquis Rorise is another of Mora's vassals, and holds Rorise, Brodie, and Somem.
Baron Powaza holds just that one system as Mora's vassal.
Count of Palique holds Pelique, Nexine, Mainz, Pedase, and Tussinian but is not a vassal of Mora, nor of Trin either.
Just a thought
Feudal systems historically are only 2-3 layers deep of nobles.
Layer 0: Sovereign
Layer 1: "Barons" (which includes Barons, Viscounts, Counts/Earls/Jarls), Royal knighthoods, Kngihts-Bannerette of the crown
Layer 2: knights and knights bannerettes
Layer 3: Vauvasar Knights (Knights of Bannerettes)
(Layer 4): the populace.
Note that, even when there are bannerettes with vassals, those vassal knights are created by the noble class only, never by the knights themselves. (But note as well - almost all historical barons-greater were also knights.)
So, if any nobleman has knights or other nobles assigned to answer to him, that's STILL feudal if it involves personal oaths, even if the answerable noble is created by the crown.
Also, historically, and completely unlike Bill Down's system, No greater baron ever was in fealty to anyone but the crown - Barons, Viscounts, Earls, Dukes - those greater barons all answer DIRECTLY to the crown.
Oh, and if you want to solve the issue of "Dukes answering to Dukes"... make the domain into a sector - eliminate the domain and use the Archduke for the sector. (complete with knighthood granting)...
IMTU,I see no need for things to be that complex. Barons, Counts, ect., are not vassals of anyone but the Emperor. So your system, while interesting, doesn't apply in the least here. IMTU, a Title is a title, what it represents is how much trust and faith the Emperor has in you and what he is willing to place in your care. It is NOT a social placement in a traditional feudal system, so Barons do not report to the Marquis, Counts do not have Marquis and Barons for vassals, nor do they report to the Dukes. All nobles report to the Emperor.
IMTU, the Dukes are tied to the maps because they are charged with running the Imperial Navy in the name of the Emperor, and doing so keeps the focused on the job the Emperor has given them. To do otherwise is counter-intuitive and causes, IMO an unnecessarily complex system.
All nobles IMTU owe fealty directly to, and only to, the Emperor and no one else. They are assigned to their fiefs by the Emperor to act as as a direct representative of the Imperium (Read the Emperor) to the world. They make sure their assigned worlds pay their taxes, do not violate what few Imperial Laws that exist, manage whatever Imperial assets are on the worlds they are assigned, and act as a go-between for their assigned wold(s) and the Emperor as needed. They will work with other Nobles to resolve any disputes that may arise between the world(s) they are assigned and those of assigned to other Nobles, but mostly, they do very little, and reap great rewards from it. How they enforce Imperial will is by diplomacy, threat/use of force (calling in the Imperial Navy) or by Interdiction (Red Zoning the world in question).
It should also be noted, that when the Emperor ups your rank (Say from Baron to Marquis) he either assigns you another nearby world, or moves you to the new world(s) to which you are assigned, and then reassigns the world(s) you formerly represented to another Noble.
I understand that the Imperium I use, is not a Feudal system in anything but name. It is more a Technocracy than anything else. Those that agree to Imperial "rule" get to govern themselves (Provided they enforce a few common laws), are protected from outside threats, and gain access to travel and trade with over 11,000 worlds. Those that refuse rule by the Imperium, that are within its boarders, are Red Zoned, and NO ONE contacts them, nor are they allowed off of their world either. Threats to the Imperium that threaten it's stability are crushed without mercy.
I guess the problem I see with your having all Nobles answering only to the Emperor is the huge communications lag within the Imperium. Assuming the subsector capital is located somewhere near the center of the subsector, it still could take a month or more for problems on a planet to reach the subsector head, three months for the sector capital, and maybe a year to reach Capital. That sort of time lag pretty much forces a devolution of authority to the Sector and Subsector leaders, with the ability to give orders which must be obeyed to lower-ranking nobles. Remember, the minimum communication time between 2 planets one parsec apart is going to be two weeks.
Actually, IIRC, 3I travel times are one year to Capital from Regina by J2, 6 months by J4, and 4 months by J6 (all one-way). Within a sub-sector, its either no more than four weeks round trip when using J4, or two weeks using J5 or J6 (providing the Sub-Sector Capital is near the center of the map). When taking into account J4 X-Boat use, and J6 military couriers, times are considerably shorter than by J2.
Yes, it takes time for the Emperor to respond, but the areas are in the control of Nobles he has either hand picked, or approved to continue their control of the area. He trusts them to do the right thing in his name. At worst, the longest a Noble can expect to get away with something for before response from the Emperor, is is about eight to twelve months tops. As for repercussions from Sub-sector and Sector Dukes, who will react on the Emperors behalf, much, much sooner. So really, in the scheme of things, about enough time for a really good adventure to be played out, and no longer.
Er, I'm no canonista, but I'm pretty sure it's 1 year one way on J4 X-boat messages and you get the faster times with the secret J6 service.
Course, you can shrink the Imperium down for an ATU. Might not even be a bad idea for a more viable polity.
Just checked http://travellermap.com using the route finder. (GREAT resource!)
Regina to Capital by J2 :154 parsecs - 83 jumps, by Jump 4: 154 parsecs - 39 jumps, by Jump 6: 154 parsecs — 26 jumps.
So longer than my original estimates, but not terribly so.
Hmmmph, I have 1980s Traveller Library Data running around in my head, I'd accept that map as definitive, assuming the calc program is correct and really routes, not direct distance measurement.
Just checked http://travellermap.com using the route finder. (GREAT resource!)
Regina to Capital by J2 :154 parsecs - 83 jumps, by Jump 4: 154 parsecs - 39 jumps, by Jump 6: 154 parsecs — 26 jumps.
So longer than my original estimates, but not terribly so.
Actually, that's not quite correct.Also, historically, and completely unlike Bill Down's system, No greater baron ever was in fealty to anyone but the crown - Barons, Viscounts, Earls, Dukes - those greater barons all answer DIRECTLY to the crown.
Of course, not of that matters if Cryton does not wish to use it - it's his ATU.
My main point earlier was to separate the titles from straight lines on a map to something more physical, like stellar clumping. I've never seen a map of any place where all of the boundaries were along lines of latitude and longitude.