[m;]Please, stay on target. Take tangents to new threads in Random Static or the Political Pulpit, as appropriate.[/m;]
Apologies and I apologise if I have offended anyone,
Sorry
David
Last edited:
[m;]Please, stay on target. Take tangents to new threads in Random Static or the Political Pulpit, as appropriate.[/m;]
Given all that, what you are describing is what a competent/non-lazy referee will do anyway, table or no. So, let's have a table with defined assumptions for everyone else.
I would say you need a way to quickly assess the state of a planet's economy
where you are recruiting.
A fair point, but not really part of Traveller. Again, I would suggest that if factors outside a ready table come into play, the referee should impose them himself. In your example, if the world is noted for having a booming economy at the current time, the referee should give a penalty . If tumbleweed is rolling through the starport, a bonus - but perhaps neither should be a 'standard' modifier...
A fair point, but not really part of Traveller. Again, I would suggest that if factors outside a ready table come into play, the referee should impose them himself. In your example, if the world is noted for having a booming economy at the current time, the referee should give a penalty . If tumbleweed is rolling through the starport, a bonus - but perhaps neither should be a 'standard' modifier...
the scales for crew in the CRB are the same as in CT. Ship Crews SHOULD make a lot more. A lot more responsibility, and a lot more firepower, in a ship with 2G drives. Every ship is capable of being a weapon of mass destruction.
OTOH, those scales for crew in the CRB are for civilian merchant crews, not for starmercs, so all your "bounus" could be offser by the more danger, responsability (in another sense), etc... mercs confront...
Should a civilian merchant ship steward (salary 2000 Cr/month) be paid the same than a Merc Colonel (2000 Cr/month, in the CT:LLB4 scale), plus more expensive lodge and food (life support), even if he gets no shares of any success bonus?
Pay rates are fundmanetal to this system, so I would be very interested in hearing more thoughts on the above. How much should Mercs be normally paid?
At least enough for being competitive with civilan starship rates:
"Do you offer me a place as Company Surgeon Captain in your unit, with a salary of Cr 1400 a month plus shares (CT:LBB 4 Captain's salary) when I'm earning Cr 4400 a month1 as starship's doctor without any risk and a quiet post? Do you really expect me to accept or are you joking?"
Note 1: I asume skill level 2, so 10% bonus, as he must be a Surgeon, so a Doctor, to be offered the job as Company Surgeon
That's a perpetual problem with military vs. civilian pay rates. Avoiding RL comparisons, certain specialties in a merc unit will demand comparable pay rates to their civilian counterparts ala the mini-vignette above; shares of a success bonus would count as "hazard pay" above and beyond salary to cover the differential in job conditions. This is, of course, independent of individual motivations, which fall below what I understand to be the granularity of this system.
Find out what title you get: Private Military Contractor may mean high wages, pus bonus, but no share.
Assume that quoted wages are standard for qualified ex military types, probably Imperium Army or Marines, and scale downwards, by large reputable mercenary units. Modified by 401Ks or any pension plan.
Scale upwards for specializations that are force multipliers.
Scale downwards for recruits and private second class, or equivalent, that are locally recruited but promised a permanent slot.
Tickets should include the provision for non-domicile taxation exemption.
This overlooks the potential size of the shares. Those shares are the reason for the low salaries. If the company succeeds, that company surgeon is going to earn more than his starship doctor colleague.At least enough for being competitive with civilan starship rates:
"Do you offer me a place as Company Surgeon Captain in your unit, with a salary of Cr 1400 a month plus shares (CT:LBB 4 Captain's salary) when I'm earning Cr 4400 a month1 as starship's doctor without any risk and a quiet post? Do you really expect me to accept or are you joking?"
Note that other sources claim they're charging $1500/day to put a man in field... 2.5x what the direct hires are typically paid by DOD.
not sure if anyone here would be able to answer this, but how does that $1500/day figure compare to the per-day costs for a putting a normal, US army infantryman in the field?
Since these are generic rules, I'd suggest adding options for salaries. Mercenaries would accept lower pay with the prospect of hefty success bonuses (or loot if the trade isn't regulated the way it appears to be in the Third Imperium). Mercenaries would also sometimes accept little more than room and board for garrisson duty if it was a slow season (do the standard salaries include room and board?) I'm not sure how much less would be appropriate. It would depend on the prospects (and the fame of the mercenary leader who was recruiting) how much less they'd accept for a mission. Perhaps define average bonus levels for several pay cuts, e.g. 1/4 pay, 1/2 pay, 3/4 pay?
I've never seen any evidence to support the notion that it is Royal Navy tradition. If you have any, I'd be very interested to hear.Outside of overdramatic Heinlienization (which actually inspired my own simplified/paralleled military hierarchy construct), it's backed up by at least British naval tradition, whether they get virtually bumped up or not.