Originally posted by flykiller:
could such an approach to advancement and command actually work in any culture?
Generally, I think it would not be sustainable, however isolated occasions, and this is probably one of those it may well occur and work.
Let's face it there are parallels in much sci-fi. The Klingons have already been mentioned and there is also the ST:TOS episode where Kirk and a couple of others inadvertantly cross to a negative image of their universe where Kirks command of the Enterprise is under threat from most of the senior officers.
IIRC in this case he gives the alternative Spock the key to taking and maintaining control as the Vulcans logic recognises that the culture is fatally flawed.
One other good example is E E 'Doc' Smiths Boskone from the Lensman series. Here is an entire culture built on 'might is right' and 'the end justifies the means'. Advancement is by showing yourslf in a better light than those around and immediately above you. The main qualifications for holding a post are just that holding it against attacks from underlings whilst fulfilling the duties of the post to the satisfaction of your superiors.
In most cases the challenges are only going to come from one or two strata below but will take many forms. In the lower orders or 'enforcement' branches physical violence is probably justified, after all how else does a thug prove his toughness, but in higher orders the out performing of superiors can take many forms. Indeed Kinnison advances through the Boskonian military by tactically out performing his Major in the war games trials having disobeyed his orders but performed a tactical success. Admitedly this conforntation ended with Kinnison killing the Major in a dual but the provcation for the dual stemmed from the war games.
I believe that such a society can lead to stable government. Just because people in various offices change does not mean that the overall direction, goal or philosophy of the society should be different. I'm not sure that I want to live in such a society, but that, as they say, is a differnet issue.
Editted for spelling errors 18:44 BST 04/08/05