• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Most uncool starship?

Almost the K'Kree school of ship design... except they do big internally open flying saucers...

Modified it could be very funny.
Nothing secret. Passed from one cattle farmer to another. About 60 years old, one refit at 38.
One of the cattle ranchers put a few retrofitted old RVs in it for staterooms. This could go on and on.
 
Last edited:
Ships of Clement Sector 6: Swift Flyer is godawful ugly, green to boot and is supposed to be a luxury yacht. It looks like it was cobbled together from dead SDB's of mixed classes.

Inside it seems an excellent design.

I respect your opinion, but I really liked that ship. I thought it had a very predatory look. It kind of puts me in mind of the Traveller version of a Klingon Bird of Prey. I'm not trying to start an argument though, just expressing a differing opinion.

William
 
Pretty much all the ships in CTs Fighting Ships book look very inelegant. I think its the worst CT book by far.
 
Pretty much all the ships in CTs Fighting Ships book look very inelegant. I think its the worst CT book by far.

Compared to what we can produce today the art is primitive. However, I enjoyed numerous vessels. It would have been nice if more time had been spent on the design.
 
Many times, its the artist that changes my mind. I've seen some silly pics of an X-Boat, and I've seen some damn cool ones.

Good point.

With that in mind, you could do the opposite. What about quizzing players to find out what they think is cool/neat/essential, then give them the opposite.
 
Pretty much all the ships in CTs Fighting Ships book look very inelegant.

I have to agree. I generally found the illustrations of the large ships in CT:Fighting Ships to be fairly uninspiring. Notable exceptions are the Ghalalk and the Midu Agashaam, both of which I really like.

I think sometimes that some of the artists ran with the "you don't need streamlining in vacuum" argument too far to the opposite extreme, and actually rendered ships in such a way as to showcase the concept while actually making the ship functionally inferior for other reasons. The Arakoine for example. Why have the spinal mount exposed on a forward "boom", rendering the main weapon of the ship highly vulnerable? Make the ship completely ovoid (still uncool, of course) and enclose the mount, at least, so that it becomes a hardened target. Or the Skimkish (which is difficult to visualize from the Supplement 9 illustration in any event). It looks very much from the illustration like a dispersed structure, which not only is a vulnerability for a combat vessel, but also makes internal movement of personnel and equipment needlessly cumbersome.

Many times, its the artist that changes my mind. I've seen some silly pics of an X-Boat, and I've seen some damn cool ones.

Again agreed. I can think of plenty of times that a ship that I thought was ugly got re-drawn/re-rendered by another artist (sometimes by someone on CotI), and suddenly became really cool-looking. Some of magmagmag's illustrations come to mind (his version of the Fer-de-lance does wonders for its coolness . . . :))
 
Last edited:
Back
Top