• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Passenger Transport Pods

And I want to throw this quote from CT Alien Realms into the mix:

ONE LOUSY PARSEC
Finding transport to Emerald was not easy. Emerald's chief exports were agricultural in nature, moved about by enormous grain ships of every shape and size. One ship fitted with refrigeration cargo capacity had just completed a turn for a meat packing consortium on Emerald, and was heading back for yet another. The captain was taking on passengers for the return trip, and soon filled up with soldiers willing to meet his price- Cr5000 per head, so to speak.
The accommodations were charming, to say the least- twenty men per bay, straw for the lucky few who got a bed at all, and soldiers would have to bring their own food. The rules were simple, to match-all weapons to be checked with the crew, no fighting, and all complaints would be ignored.
After an "uneventful" trip, the bay doors were opened, and the heroic veterans of the Fifth Frontier War were unceremoniously dumped off in a field next to a slaughter house outside of Emerald starport.
 
Ground school, back in 1987 and again in 1989.
Not too long before I got my commercial, then.

Going halvsies on gas, provided he's present at fill-up, is providing in kind.
Though "present at fill-up" is nebulous. He's paying for gas, you're filing next leg, and your other buddy is picking up lunch. Starts to sound like a crew. ;)

Do it too often, tho', and attract FAA attention (like a complaint) and kiss your ticket goodbye. People in Alaska HAVE lost their ticket over it.
I believe it. One of the keys to whether it's a violation is whether you have a relationship with the people, other than this airplane trip. If not, then the FAA begins to wonder if you're running a scam. (No large bureaucracy is known for absolute consistency, either.)

(More pilots per capita up here. Can't go into a bar on a friday without running into at least 2.)
Yep. I have known lots of colleagues from Alaska; had a cousin who lived there for a goodly while. Most of them had at least a private license. I loved my almost month-long trip to Eielson AFB one Jan-Feb.
 
Not too long before I got my commercial, then.


Though "present at fill-up" is nebulous. He's paying for gas, you're filing next leg, and your other buddy is picking up lunch. Starts to sound like a crew. ;)
Nothing wrong with a crew...

IMTU, based heavily upon Exit Visa and some elements in TTA, 90% of 3I Law/Code Enforcement is local customs.
 
The next time I get the urge to post an idea here, I will take the Urge, stand it against a wall, and execute it with a firing squad.
 
I second that. Conflict and competition are a positive evolutionary process in the intellectual arena.

Just remember that the idea is getting pasted and worked over like a rough stone in a rock tumbler. If it has anything of worth then it will shine nicely when it pops out of the other end - if not, just try not to take it personally since it isn't you that is being thrashed, just the idea. And often times that is only a matter of taste.
 
And I want to throw this quote from CT Alien Realms into the mix:

Well, you gotta figure cargo may occasionally include cattle or other livestock. Besides, you gotta figure there's some sort of air cycling system in there or the first time you opened the bay on a world with some sort of atmospheric contaminant, you'd end up taking that contaminated air with you. Be very bad to have a crewman go into the cargo hold for something and pass out because the last place you visited had a CO2 atmosphere.
 
Well, you gotta figure cargo may occasionally include cattle or other livestock. Besides, you gotta figure there's some sort of air cycling system in there or the first time you opened the bay on a world with some sort of atmospheric contaminant, you'd end up taking that contaminated air with you. Be very bad to have a crewman go into the cargo hold for something and pass out because the last place you visited had a CO2 atmosphere.

Life Support, in the context of Traveller, includes:

Atmosphere - oxygenation control (addition or removal as needed), removal of CO and CO2 (and probably SO₂, H₂S, NH₃, CH₄, CH₄S, C₂H₆S, C₂H₆S₂, C₂H₆S₃ - all human waste related gasses - and N₂0, O₃, and H₂O₂, which can form from sparks in a standard atmosphere), Humidity control (mostly removal).

Water - purification of waste water, production of drinking water and bathing water. Control over atmospheric water. Probably also cooking water.

Temperature - positive control to specific temperature (probably ±2°C)

Food - storage and preparation space and equipment.

Some of these, cattle and such are going to overload. I'd expect a shipment of cattle to include scrubbers and O₂ tanks, as well as feed grains. When it's not 4 Td multi-cow low-berths with 3 days battery backup.
 
Last time I looked you don't put live cattle in a refrigerated hold...

If not, then you'd better keep that hold's walls away from sunlight.

All portions of a ship with atmosphere are likely to need thermoregulation in both directions. that ±2°C is from whatever temp you choose, by the way.

NASA had to both heat and cool the shuttle cockpit, just for reference.
 
That's not the point I was making - live cattle are not carried in refrigerated containers, the fact that the refrigeration is mentioned in the quote implies dead moo moos.

Now if the hold is equipped to carry dead animals why bother with the other niceties of life support, namely water, oxygen and CO2 scrubbing in the hold?

The fact that you can cram in a load of ex-squaddies into a refrigerated hold implies that the ship's life support is more than capable of handling the additional stress of all the extra live bodies, way above the stateroom limit.

Heat regulation for the entire ship it a totally different issue and was not the intent of my post.
 
Last edited:
Last time I looked you don't put live cattle in a refrigerated hold...

Occurs to me belatedly that you could use the cow equivalent of low berths. Owner would provide the berths - already occupied. You'd have to supply the power. Would prevent a heavy load on your water recycling system, not to menthion the need to bring feed and deal with the, uh, output. You'd only be responsible for making sure the berths arrived intact: owner would foot the cost for any animal that didn't survive the trip. Anything that didn't make it would be butchered and sold on the receiving end to recover some of that loss.

Only problem is that the owner would have the cost of flying the empty berths back. I can see them doing that for something special - a high-value breeding bull or some such.
 
The Traveller low berths are the cow equivalent - sort of.

The low berth and the low lottery are a direct rip off from the Dumarest novels - in which down on their luck travellers have to resort to using cold berth meant for shipping animals, hence the chance of death.
 
Wouldn't one issue be that if you use cold berths the cows would now be considered "frozen" rather than fresh, never frozen.... Sounds like an advertising nightmare to me.... :oo:
 
"Did your steak come out of a Low Berth? Does it taste more like pork? Buy Hansen Farms meats and never wonder where your meat came from again.":devil:
 
Back
Top