• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Small Craft Deck Plan Challenge

kilemall

SOC-14 5K
Ran across this image today, of the wreck of what is left of a Russian WIG plane. It looks VERY Traveller, just about the right size for a small craft, so I thought I would turn our deck plan stars loose on it.

The plane in flight-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZgWjxYTJS8

In flight in experimental mode-

vva14-4.jpg


Intended full design-



Derelict remains at a museum (the Traveller look!)-



tumblr_mp9sgurMCa1qiw9xho1_500.png


Fuel in the pontoons, M-drive in the pods above them and under the ship, small craft sized, designed likely for water world service, love to see one of our guys do a deck plan based on it.
 
Last edited:
Well if we are talking literal translation it looks very 20-30 ton to me, given the relative size of the chair in the cockpit.

However, no reason to constrain yourself to 'modelling', the look and the unique seaplane float form factor is the thing to capture IMO.

Don't think I've seen any water specific ship craft built other then water vehicle only for the Sailors, or the generic 'floating in water getting fuel' imagery.
 
Here are the specs on the one in the pictures:

Specifications (Bartini Beriev VVA-14M1)

General characteristics
Crew: 3
Length: 25.97 m (85 ft 2 in)
Wingspan: 30 m (98 ft 5 in)
Height: 6.79 m (22 ft 3 in)
Wing area: 217.79 m2 (2344 ft2)
Empty weight: 23,236 kg (51,119 lb)
Gross weight: 52,000 kg (114,400 lb)
Powerplant: (Cruise) 2 × Soloviev D-30M turbofans, 67 kN (15062 lbf) thrust each
(VTOL - not fitted) 12 × 12 RD-36-35 PR lift turbofan engines, 43 kN (9,666 lbf) thrust each

Performance
Maximum speed: 760 km/h (472 mph)
Cruising speed: 640 km/h (398 mph)
Range: 2,450 km (1,522 miles)
Service ceiling: 8,000-10,000 m (26,247-32,808 ft)

Note that the prototype had rigid pontoons, but the production version was to have inflatable pontoons (to reduce weight and in-flight drag).


The Bartini Beriev VVA-14 Vertikal`no-Vzletayuschaya Amphibia (vertical take-off amphibious aircraft) was a wing-in-ground-effect aircraft developed in the Soviet Union during the 1970s. Designed to be able to take-off from the water and fly at high speed over long distances, it was to make true flights at high altitude, but also have the capability of 'flying' efficiently just above the sea surface, using aerodynamic ground effect. The VVA-14 was designed by Robert Bartini in answer to a perceived requirement to destroy United States Navy Polaris missile submarines.

Bartini, in collaboration with the Beriev Design Bureau intended to develop the prototype VVA-14 in three phases. The VVA-14M1 was to be an aerodynamics and technology testbed, initially with rigid pontoons on the ends of the central wing section, and later with these replaced by inflatable pontoons. The VVA-14M2 was to be more advanced, with two starting engines to blast into the cavity under the wing to give lift and later with a battery of lift engines to give VTOL capability, and with fly-by-wire flight controls. The VVA-14M3 would see the VTOL vehicle fully equipped with armament and with the Burevestnik computerised ASW (anti-submarine warfare) system, Bor-1 MAD (magnetic anomaly detector) and other operational equipment.

After extensive research, including the development of the small prototype Be-1 wing in ground effect aircraft, the first VVA-14 prototype was completed in 1972. Its first flight was from a conventional runway on 4 September 1972.

In 1974 the inflatable pontoons were installed, though their operation caused many problems. Flotation and water taxi tests followed, culminating in the start of flight testing of the amphibious aircraft on 11 June 1975.

The inflatable pontoons were later replaced by rigid pontoons, while the fuselage was lengthened and the starting engines added. This incarnation was given the designation 14M1P. However, the bureau supplying the intended battery of 12 RD-36-35PR lift engines did not deliver, and this made VTOL testing impossible.

After Bartini's death in 1974, the project slowed and eventually drew to a close, the aircraft having conducted 107 flights, with a total flight time of 103 hours. The only remaining VVA-14, No. 19172, was retired to the Russian Federation Central Air Force Museum, Monino in 1987. The aircraft still resides at the museum in a dismantled state, where it carries the number '10687' and 'Aeroflot'.
 
Fuel in the pontoons, M-drive in the pods above them and under the ship, small craft sized, designed likely for water world service, love to see one of our guys do a deck plan based on it.

It would probably have to be statted like the Gig, since you need high performance to take up very much space with drives and fuel when there is no jump drive to help.
 
It would probably have to be statted like the Gig, since you need high performance to take up very much space with drives and fuel when there is no jump drive to help.

Well given the large amount of space tied up in those two bits that are not conducive to cargo hauling, those seemed the most rational uses of that space in a Traveller small craft context to me.

Alternatively you could scale it up to be a 100 or 200 ton trader with pontoons while keeping the look.
 
Well given the large amount of space tied up in those two bits that are not conducive to cargo hauling, those seemed the most rational uses of that space in a Traveller small craft context to me.

Alternatively you could scale it up to be a 100 or 200 ton trader with pontoons while keeping the look.

I was thinking of an interface ship for a water world. Needs to get into space and also be submersible and surface capable for getting to those various aquatic habs.
 
OTOH, you could scale it up in size and get a nice, streamlined 200 T freighter that is water-world friendly.

IMTU some dirtside starports have 'wet' landing bays for ships of unconventional design and unusual configuration, think 'whale' tanks from aquatic parks, so a ship as proposed would make use of such over a 'dry' port.
 
Back
Top