I assume you mean planetary corporations rather than megacorporations. Any such all-encompassing setup runs up against the problem that you need a prosperous population to sell stuff to. That sort of corporation can profit only by leeching off a much greater economy. For one thing, companies don't waste money on housing anyone that isn't working for them.
Leaching up a much greater economy? 30 billons is not enough in number? 3millions billionnaires, 3 billions millionnaire?
They dont waste money on housing those that do not work for the corp, they make money by renting dwelling to any takers, first and foremost those working for them
How do you know that? What do you base that assumption on? And if you're right, how do you explain belter societies where everyone, from the poorest pauper up, live in space habitats?.
Sci-fi consider belter canon, there is an assumption that the worker can carve out a good living from the belt. That is the explanation, not detailled economic.
See refutation of claim that tunnels will be significantly cheaper. (And doubt that they'd exist in sufficient numbers.)
I don't buy it. Even if the saving are small (and they wont) for the poor such saving will be significant. High end orbital habitat come with all the trimming for it will make no sense to pay that much and not have adequate lighting and grav plate (as an example). Your tunnel might not have grav plate and top of the line utilities because you can't afford non slum housing.
I don't understand this argument at all.
When you are poor, the ratio Shell/fitting is significant.
I suspect that you're somehow riffing on starship accomodation costs. Surely you don't think that living in a space habitat could possibly be that expensive? ..
GURP starport, the closest thing I know to a traveller space habitat design system have indeed inexpensive shell (about 8kcr for 25 tons) but says that accomodation is paid as stateroom with 8 time the space.
I refer you, once more, to the existence of belter communities where everybody lives in space habitats. Shionthy is a red zone, so its population certainly manages to live in space habitats at TL 8 without food imports...
They could, like the peoples of Rethe could. And as soon as red will be lifted they wont, they will start trading like the peoples of Rethe do
I never said everyone on Rethe would necessarily live in orbital habitats. I suggested most of them did, although I failed to mention that there would also be people living in the two belts..
Fine, one or two billions?
You could do the same with high-capacity dormitories in space habitats.
yes, that is mentionned in my housing study
Also, you seem to imagine that putting people in a disused tunnel with only a blanket to separate their living space is enough. If you do that, they'll just up and die on you. Rethe's atmosphere is not breathable. Any machinery you need to keep people alive on a space station you'll need equally well to keep them alive in a tunnel.
.
There is more to space habitat than ventilation. On the surface, or under, you just vent off used air and compress/filter some new one, for example. Everything is more complex in orbit.
Why not? We here on Earth are eating recycled remains of our dead ancestors and our neighbors' waste. Doesn't seem to upset most people.
Hans
My tomatoes may be grown from manure (my mushroom certainely) and we do not make a fuss, indeed. Still, it is not as crude as known extreme recycling. Furthermore, the argument remains: choice.
Have fun
Selandia