It still says arboreal in Library data A-M.
Interesting that when the subject of Rations comes up, comments always follow. Maybe I should post something regarding the rations for War Dogs and Horses/Mules in World War 2, which would give some idea of Vargr and K'kree food requirements, given that the K'kree average 550 kilos per Mongoose Library Data. And I would suspect that the food requirements for an adult Terran Lion would be a reasonable approximation for the Aslan.
GT AR 2 - arboreal - later stillAM 1 is the later source.
GT AR 2 - arboreal - later still
Wonder what MgT says :devil:
If you're going that route, then the parallel niche for the aslan ancestor is something like a leopard, in the same way that our ancestor is something like a chimp. (noting that we are only a few million years divergent from chimps.)
Every generation of whatever military complains about their field rations. Heck, when US vets complain about the newish MREs, I tell them about the five fingers, and beef brick, and the dehydrated pork and beef patty. When they fielded the ration heater sack (just add water), just that was like night and day.
The T-rats are actually quite good, but people get tired of them quick (the new field kitchens are mostly a place with water heaters for the trays, a place to mix drink mixes, and a washing area).
In 1105 there must be 3I Marines bitching about the paste in the battledress, and the (probably) quite good field rations when they can take the BD off for a while.
Which makes me think of a plot point or color. Field rations prior to and after the FFW. Prior to they are for all major races, and therefore tasteless and poorly textured for all. Afterward there were so many complaints that even sector courts and the Moot asked questions, and now the meals are divided by race, and pretty good eating. The issues are two fold: There are still hundreds of millions of pre-change meals in the supply system and storage; and supply and logistics just got 4 times harder, which means a huge chance of screwing up the correct mix for a unit.
"aww, man! Aslan Rations AGAIN? my bayonet is going blunt trying to cut all this steak!"
As this appears to have turned into a discussion of rations which, while near and dear to my heart, is not the purpose of the thread, would it be possible for one of the moderators to move everything including post 248, excepting post 250, to another thread specifically for rations?
The terms of the Geneva Convention provided that prisoners would be fed a type A ration equal in quantity and quality to that of custodial troops in base camps, but it soon became apparent that this allowance could not be provided. When reports were received that American prisoners in German camps were suffering from malnutrition and that the average ration in the German Army approximated 2,700 calories, the OCQM decided that there was no justification for providing the German soldier with a ration increase of 25 percent merely because he had achieved prisoner of war status. General Littlejohn contended, in fact, that it would be wasteful to feed an American ration of 3,700 to 4,000 calories to prisoners who were accustomed to less than American soldiers
General Littlejohn argued that this menu was not likely to lead to malnutrition: "Definitely I do not intend to go along on a ration which will cause prisoners to starve to death, or throw them into our hospitals. Neither do I intend to be a party to a ration which will make the Germans fat." (Emphasis added by yours truly.)
You do have a point, however, I do have several volumes covering rations development for the US Army (note, I am not kidding about the several volumes), to include the distinction between rations for French troops supplied by the US under Lend-Lease, Moslem troops, civilians, civilians working for the US Army in some way, Prisoners of War, and Prisoners of War performing work for the US Army.