Your pilot is sitting down in a chair and looking straight up (and not forward) out of his viewport as he flies around. To be able to look forward while flying you need to move the bridge forward 3-4.5m or extend the view windshield to where the second red band first crosses the centerline of the ship....
Thanks for pointing this out! (really). I will update this in my Autorealm external plans and eventually update it on the website.
Your upper "attic" and lower "hold" are at peak maximun 2.286m (7'6") tall. A majority of these decks are really just 1.5m (half deck) tall. One can adjust the area on the deckplans to be slightly bigger to compensate.....
I will look into this. I just "guestimated" when dividing the decks into half and full squares. My end result was after many, many redraws until the tonnage of the half and full squares added up to a proper total tonnage. I did have a larger attic and hold, but ended up reducing their size to make the math right.......
.....I looked into this on my original that has more graph lines across it. The peak for the attic is at 3 meters, but of course that is not considering floor and bulkhead thicknesses (I will probably never strive for that much mathematical accuracy in my plans). Looking at my aft view super-imposed with a 1.5m grid shows the inner 4 squares average 2 squares high, while the outter squares on each side average 1 square high (when being forced to choose between 1 or 2 squares high, nothing in between or smaller). As you go forward, the number of 2 square height squares would dwindle quickly, the reason I ended up with the plans going from 4-squares wide at the back, to quickly dwindling to 1-square wide as you go forward.
I did notice that the hold would not have a flat floor (due to the "underpeak") if it were to have the same sized squares as the attic. I can look past this, but others may not like it. Perhaps the cargo bay is not flat, but dips somewhat in the middle? Floor grating with some of the cargo space below it? The scout may have not been the best choice for a first deck plan due to the strange wedge shape.
I limited my squares on my pencil sketch when computing tonnage to a choice of either 2 squares high or 1 square high for simplicity sake. Of course these are gross averages, not exact heights for each square.
You will note that the air/raft attic bay is wider then 4-squares. If you count the tonnage, the side squares are actually half height (all 4 of them add up to 1 ton). If you look close there are dashed lines to indicate where this happens. This makes the bay 4 tons, not 5 tons like it might appear at first. I noted this in the plans, saying the outter walls are greatly slanted.
I in no way claim that my plans will hold up under exact mathematical scrutiny. I never intended them to. But I did try to improve on the accuracy from the CT version and consider the wedge shape.
Thanks for the criticisms (again, really)
I finished the Seeker in AutoREALM today, I should have the webpage up by tomorrow night? It's based on the MGT version (has mining drones) and I had fun (per MGT) making ore processing equipment. The systems displayed (drones, seeker buggy, ore bays, processing station) I think will allow those looking at it to understand how the Seeker actually can gather and process the ore.
