It seems to me that there are three possibilities here. 1) [Change] is a deliberate retcon and represents a choice between what used to be and what MGT wants it to be.
Hans,
I think that represents 99.99% of the changes we've seen.
2) [Change] is a mistake, but TPTB at Mongoose do not want to admit that, so they insist that it's deliberate, and refuse to fix it.
I don't believe that's been the case with any of the changes/mistakes because of...
3) [Change] is a mistake, and TPTB at Mongoose are willing to admit it and fix the error.
...
that. We've already seen Mongoose admit to errors and take steps to fix those errors that can be corrected without releasing entirely new versions of book that have only been out for months if not weeks.
A Mongoose errata page with freely available downloads correcting the identified mistakes in all their products, much like the SJGames system, would be a very good idea.
The disconnect here is due to two different "values" for the term "approval". Roughly speaking, there is "Jot & Tittle" approval and "Broad Brushstroke" approval. We presume, and Mongoose certainly implies, that "Jot & Tittle" approval has been at work. However, when you take time to examine the situation, you'll quickly realize that "Jot & Tittle" approval is an impossibility.
Aside from having a personal life, which includes becoming a grandfather recently, Marc W. Miller has a real printing business
and FFE and the
T5 playtest
and inquiries from the Hobby
and several other things that can only be guessed at all vying for his limited time. Even if we cloned him several times, Mr. Miller still would not have the time "Jot & Tittle" approval requires.
"Jot & Tittle" approval is a lengthy process. It requires several read-throughs, several back-and-forths as the manuscript is passed between the writer, the publisher, and the "approver". Mr. Miller simply does not have the time for that process and, given Mongoose's fairly rapid release schedule for
MgT, such a process at the "Jot & Tittle" level would be an 100 hour a week job. So, the approval process at work here is of the "Broad Brushstroke" variety.
There are many other indications of the "Broad Brushstroke" approval process being employed and the most recent has to do with bay weaponry.
Mongoose's version of
High Guard handles bay weaponry in a much different manner than
CT or
MT. As you can read in
this post to the
Freedonian System Defense Boat thread by Don Mooney, he had tried to get Mr. Miller to sign off on a similar change to
HG2 last summer and Mr. Miller
turned the idea down. Then, only months later,
MgT: High Guard introduces what is essentially the same idea Mr. Miller had vetoed.
The implication is rather clear. Unless you're willing to believe Mr. Miller is a hypocrite, and I am most certainly not, then the approval process being used with
MgT is more of the "Broad Brushstroke" variety than the "Jot & Tittle" variety. It will do us well to remember this as more
MgT products are released.
Regards,
Bill