With its wide variety of landscapes, ecologies, resources, freshwater, coastal placement, my vote is for Texas in the long-term apocalypse. It has been said before that Texas can do without the United States, but the United States cannot do without Texas. Hurricane Rita did more economic damage to the country than Hurricane Katrina when Rita gave the refineries a big, salty enema.
Given also that Texans have a de-centralized state goverment, a single hit to the capitol will not sink them. They love their land and their guns and you can have both when you pry them from their cold, dead hands.
Speaking of hands, they're strapping mine down for the 'conversion' right no-
<end trans. OENLAETSVAEG (Goekhnael 1938)>
Yeah. And the Titanic is unsinkable. o:
Asteroid hit. No more Texas just like the hole in Central America.
Global pandemic, no more Texas decentralized gov't.
Uplift failure - Enemy from within sneak attacks.
Tactical nuclear war. It's near the Gulf within sub launch ranges.
A new ice age. Massive refugee populations (100+Million) flowing south.
Alien Invasion. ID was shot there.
So, wasn't there a zombie film in Texas? "Texas Zombie Wars" release is this year.
Should I continue?
All that being said, Houston is on the list. It offers a number of benefits to repopulate / hold up civilization!
In some scenarios, Galveston, could be a population hub seeding the big city.
Last edited: