Originally posted by robject:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by daryen:
This is subject to GM interpretation, of course. In any universe of mine, it still won't work. But then I don't believe the extra-solar effects of the Maghiz, either.
Fascinating... I mistook you for a card-carrying Knight of Darrian. But lo, you've got issues with the Star Trigger and Maghiz. Wow... </font>[/QUOTE]Well, I am pro-Darrian. I like them and their Confederation. I mean I do have a whole website dedicated to the Darrians. But I am also a cynic. And they wouldn't be much fun if they were all sunshine and happiness. You don't have to look too hard to see the potential for some
serious skeletons in the proverbial closet.
With the Maghiz, it really couldn't have worked as reported. If the "solar flare" was strong enough to catastrophical affect worlds six parsecs away, then the star didn't have a "flare"; it blew up. Daryen wouldn't have been devistated; it would have melted.
Since Daryen was not melted, and the star still exists, then there was no pulse that went past the Tarnis system. What happened to the other planets was an economic catastrophe, not a physical one. (Too bad the effect was the same.)
Also, I doubt their probe could have triggered a flare that severe. Most likely the timing was simply coincidental, and, while they believed the probe caused the flare, the flare was going to happen regardless of the probe. (Kinda like the proverbial guy who turns out the light just as the power goes out. While he is afraid to turn that light out again, they were separate incidents that were coincidental.)
Which brings us to the Start Trigger. If I don't buy the probe being the cause, then I can't believe the Star Trigger will work. Oh, I do think the Darrians
believe it works, but I don't think it really does.
So, I am still a card-carrying
Knight of Daryen. (Actually, I need to make me one of those.
![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)
I also have to see how to get my title changed to that.) However, that doesn't mean I have to buy all of the "propaganda" about them. I like seeing them with layers. I like them to have more depth.
And I am a firm believer in always keeping the "facts" of the situation unchanged, but messing with the reasons for those facts. (E.g. the Maghiz was real. But the colonies failed/regressed due to economics, not magical EMP effects.)