Well, them's the plans anyway, and we all know what happens to plans.
Only time will tell. Who's writing it?
Well, them's the plans anyway, and we all know what happens to plans.
Only time will tell. Who's writing it?
Just wondered what the novel has done for your interpretation of the setting?
A ship captain/fleet admiral coming across a problem has three options:
1. deal with it;
2. send to the nearest subsector duke for guidance/orders/authority to act - this may take a couple of months;
3. activate an agent wafer.
Note that options 2 and 3 are both passing the buck...
Apologies for the necro, but in answer to the thread title: Yes, this novel has certainly changed my view of the Imperium. Up until now I’ve seen it as much like the Empire in Asimov’s Foundation books, not especially good or bad in itself, but workable enough. But after the first few chapters (I’m up to the scrubbing of Deyis), it seems pretty clear to me: this is an evil system, however much it justifies its repeated planetary exterminations — not long-term interdictions, for which the Imperium certainly has the tonnage, but exterminations — as being for the greater good. Our always-correct Agent Bland would have solved the Ebola crisis by nuking West Africa. These aren’t automatic Cold Equations situations where physics prevents lower-case quarantining the worlds in question, though that’s obviously the novel’s intent. Frankly, I’m repulsed.
Marc's novel has got me thinking about what I thought I knew about the Imperial setting, and the implications of the technology in the novel and buried away in T5.
Just wondered what the novel has done for your interpretation of the setting?
I assume that T5SS dataset changes will be made one someone picks up the reigns from Don. The Sophont review needs at least two new additions as well.
Hooray for our first canonical world in Itvi! Current sector data there is unofficial, but I'm not updating the name to match Agent just yet.
And I wonder what "Caes" is short for...
Apologies for the necro, but in answer to the thread title: Yes, this novel has certainly changed my view of the Imperium. Up until now I’ve seen it as much like the Empire in Asimov’s Foundation books, not especially good or bad in itself, but workable enough. But after the first few chapters (I’m up to the scrubbing of Deyis), it seems pretty clear to me: this is an evil system, however much it justifies its repeated planetary exterminations — not long-term interdictions, for which the Imperium certainly has the tonnage, but exterminations — as being for the greater good. Our always-correct Agent Bland would have solved the Ebola crisis by nuking West Africa. These aren’t automatic Cold Equations situations where physics prevents lower-case quarantining the worlds in question, though that’s obviously the novel’s intent. Frankly, I’m repulsed.
Frankly, I’m repulsed.
How else do you empire stars? I find the novel an addition to what's already in use by Traveller. I look forward to the other books.
You mean "how else do you empire stars" besides glassing entire civilizations as a first option of conflict management? (I have not read the book.)
I'm sure someone could come up with something.
I would argue that Traveller's 3rd Imperium is not Star Trek's United Federation of Planets. In Star Trek, a planet-wide neutralizer (fabricated on the Enterprise during a commercial break) would be used to kill just the bad things on a planet's surface. A feudal technocracy has other things motivating it.
Our always-correct Agent Bland would have solved the Ebola crisis by nuking West Africa. These aren’t automatic Cold Equations situations where physics prevents lower-case quarantining the worlds in question, though that’s obviously the novel’s intent.
“No, not necessarily. It’s on the next graphic.” Which appeared. “Our evaluation predicts volcanic activity will essentially vaporize the Sea of Adesh. That has trade and transport consequences, but they are overwhelmed by the probable atmospheric changes: massive environmental and climate change over a short period of time; crop failures; health issues. This world faces immense challenges within the next year and they will last for centuries.”
A new image appeared; I saw predictive animations of murky skies, storms, and flooding. Catastrophic winter. It all seemed fairly straight-forward. “Is there an action plan?”
“No, Agent. Any pro-action would work more chaos than letting nature take its course. There are some educational measures we can implement. Our recommendation is to apply an Amber Zone advisory on the system and provide what support we can. There is no way to evacuate billions of people. There are some problems that just cannot be fixed.”
Like why classify a world in need of help after such a massive disaster as an "Amber" rating? This is a world that will need supplies badly.We classified the Kutubba system Amber. The label would propagate through the trade lanes; travellers and merchants would be warned that this world faced upheaval; that there was a personal risk attached to visiting. Visitors were rare in any case, but now the data banks would warn the unwary. In a year or two, the label would reach Capital and become truly official. In a few centuries, someone would re-examine the situation and might, or might not, change the warning back to Green.
My meetings with staff directed a compilation of reference data on dealing with climate change, weather-related catastrophes, and social unrest. The petabytes of information in a variety of accessible formats would be distributed widely and would probably save, over centuries, millions of lives.
I next spent a day reviewing recent historical information. I asked for a census of ships in the system. I interspersed these requests with discussions of Kutubba and projections of the catastrophes it could expect. I arranged for the Emperor’s noble to visit us in orbit; we gave him a thorough briefing. We did everything possible.
Like why classify a world in need of help after such a massive disaster as an "Amber" rating? This is a world that will need supplies badly.
I agree that does not sound very productive nor proactive. But is it in character for the agent ?