Ah yes.
Yep.Was that Dr. Jacobs at the University of Anchorage? If so, I took a History of World War 2 class from him.
A few. IIRC, mostly 19th C and in Africa. AH's Pax Britannica has a handful for them. But most of them were more trading compounds and oversized embassies than proper formal colonies. The one that was formally an Austrian extra-european colonial territory was lost during the Boxer Rebellion, and was only a few square miles of a city in the Chinese mainland.Colonies, mainly. The Colony of New South Wales originally also included Tasmania, South Australia (which once included the Northern Territory), New Zealand, Victoria, and Queensland. I think that South Australia was styled a province rather than a colony.
I wonder how the Mongol empire (say, under Kublai Khan, after the defeat of the southern Song) and the Russian empire (before the Siberian Route, a road that preceded the Trans-Siberian Railway) would compare.
Did Austria-Hungary have overseas colonies?
Yes, I have Pax Britannica, but if I remember correctly, the naval capability (which is required for establishing overseas interest/influence/protectorates/possessions) of Austria-Hungary limits its potential reach, which is why its power plays were usually concentrated in the Balkans.A few. IIRC, mostly 19th C and in Africa. AH's Pax Britannica has a handful for them.
China retained sovereignty over all of the land of its foreign concessions; only Macao and Hong Kong were colonial territories. I think that Austria-Hungary only received its concession after the Boxer Rebellion, and it lost its concession after WWI. However, I believe that Austria-Hungary was unique in granting citizenship to all of the Chinese residents who lived in its concession.But most of them were more trading compounds and oversized embassies than proper formal colonies. The one that was formally an Austrian extra-european colonial territory was lost during the Boxer Rebellion, and was only a few square miles of a city in the Chinese mainland.
Sovereignty is a tricky term.Yes, I have Pax Britannica, but if I remember correctly, the naval capability (which is required for establishing overseas interest/influence/protectorates/possessions) of Austria-Hungary limits its potential reach, which is why its power plays were usually concentrated in the Balkans.
China retained sovereignty over all of the land of its foreign concessions; only Macao and Hong Kong were colonial territories. I think that Austria-Hungary only received its concession after the Boxer Rebellion, and it lost its concession after WWI. However, I believe that Austria-Hungary was unique in granting citizenship to all of the Chinese residents who lived in its concession.
That is very likely correct, at least for those areas along the coast. Manchuria was grabbed by the Russians following the Sino-Japanese War of 1894, where Japan gained control of the island of Taiwan. Japan got control of Port Arthur following the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, and expanded to take all of Manchuria in 1931. That action was initiated by a captain and major on the Kwantung Army staff. Germany got the concession of Tsing-Tau after the Boxer Rebellion and then lost it in World War One. Japan and Russia were the most interested ones in carving up China, with the French somewhat interested, but they had taken over Indochina, and were happy with that. Great Britain did not want to see any other European power set up in competition to Hong Kong.As I recall, if it weren't for the Americans' insistence on open door policy, China would have been carved up like a Thanksgiving turkey.
Yes, it is a tricky term.Sovereignty is a tricky term.
All the colonial outposts in China were leases, even Hong Kong and Macau — both of which were non-renewed at the end of the last term. They technically were never sovereign territory of anyone but China, at least not in the same sense as French Guyana, Morocco, New South Wales, or Pennsylvania had been.