• Welcome to the new COTI server. We've moved the Citizens to a new server. Please let us know in the COTI Website issue forum if you find any problems.
  • We, the systems administration staff, apologize for this unexpected outage of the boards. We have resolved the root cause of the problem and there should be no further disruptions.

Refitted X-Boats - VW Beetles in Traveller

Actually, the way I built it went something like this...
Start with a 12 m diameter sphere. Then add a cone (Top Radiius=12, bottom radius=1.75, Height=16 meters).

Slice the top sphere in half. That comes out to about 450 m3.
The cone comes out to 820 m3. Put them together and you get 1270 m3, or 97 dtons The extra 3 tons can be built in widening some sections of the cone.

Total length = 22 m, tonnage = ~100 dtons, and it fits the side profile from Supp 7.
 
Last edited:
What's hard to understand about it?

A 10 meter long cone, and a 12 meter diameter sphere... neither occupying any space within the other.

Then the extra space is covered over to streamline it, and that space is used.

X-boatshape03A.gif


No, the internal bulkheads in the aft part of the sphere don't form a curved wall, but surely you can see what I am talking about?
It's not that it's hard to understand... it's that it's WRONG. Your illo fails to match the deckplans and the volume defined in the text.

The graphic below shows a 27m cone truncated to 16, and a 19.8m truncated to same, both with a 6m radius hemisphere. These are the correct shape, and the 27m is almost exactly 1400kl.... and gives a 22m overall length. The end radius is 2.44m on the 27m cone's 16m truncation, or 1.15m on the 19.8m cone's 16m truncation.



The only element which is inconsistent is the description on p.9. Any use of that description produces wrong values for tonnage; The plans are not terribly accurate, but close enough for a 27m cone truncated to 16m (which matches the plans pretty well) and the volume is close, too. Since it matches the text, the plans, the design, and doesn't match the blurb on the plans, then the blurb on the plans is wrong.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.jpg
    untitled.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
Although the truncated tail seems a bit wider that the illustration, I think Aramis's 27 meter cone truncated to 16 is the best. At least the Volume and Published Length come out closest. ;)

I don't have the math skills or programs that some of you do. :(

I used the hemisphere, cylinder and cone configuration because it was the best I could do. I posted it after I had figured it out because I KNEW you guys would get me straight so I could use the true "teardrop" shape shown. :D

Thanks Guys.
 
First Cut at Deckplans

and here it is... hmmm... picture didn't post correctly, anyway its in the gallery.
index.php


Got the turret and fire control station, bridge and staterooms placed, don't think the cargo bay is gonna equal 50 tons but it does have a nice roomy corridor :).

Still have to add walls/doors around bridge (guess the captain has to go thru bridge to get to his stateroom), ship's locker, clean up unwanted lines. ect

Criticize, plagiarize, ect. ect.
 
Last edited:
BK 5 X-boat and Service Module

Sorry , but I hate bk2, here is an X Boat and Service Module statted out with AMV's HGS. (I know, I said I didn't like the way it was coming out but my by hand wasn't working out any better)

Ship: Type X
Class: X-Boat
Type: X-Boat
Architect: Gray Lensman
Tech Level: 13
USP
XB-1540441-000000-00000-0 MCr 90.500 100 Tons
Bat Bear Crew: 1
Bat TL: 13
Cargo: 6.000 Emergency Low: 1 Fuel: 44.000 EP: 4.000 Agility: 0
Backups: 4 x Model/1 Computers
Architects Fee: MCr 0.905 Cost in Quantity: MCr 72.400

Detailed Description
HULL
100.000 tons standard, 1,400.000 cubic meters, Sphere/Cone Configuration
CREW
Pilot
ENGINEERING
Jump-4, 0G Manuever, Power plant-4, 4.000 EP, Agility 0
AVIONICS
Bridge, Model/4 Computer
4 Model/1 Backup Computers
FUEL
44.000 Tons Fuel (4 parsecs jump and 28 days endurance)
No Fuel Scoops, No Fuel Purification Plant
MISCELLANEOUS
2.0 Staterooms, 1 Emergency Low Berth, 6.000 Tons Cargo
USER DEFINED COMPONENTS
None
COST
MCr 91.405 Singly (incl. Architects fees of MCr 0.905), MCr 72.400 in Quantity
CONSTRUCTION TIME
38 Weeks Singly, 30 Weeks in Quantity
COMMENTS
Was able to add 1 ELB for emergencies
Was able to add 5 tons of Important Cargo
Fuel Endurance is 28 days instead of 3
Put in four Mod/1 Computers for mail storage

AND..............

Ship: Wandering Viola
Class: Wanderer Class
Type: X Boat Service Module
Architect: Gray Lensman
Tech Level: 13
USP
XM-0402301-000000-30000-0 MCr 32.805 100 Tons
Bat Bear 1 Crew: 1
Bat 1 TL: 13
Cargo: 63.000 Emergency Low: 1 Fuel: 3.000 EP: 3.000 Agility: 0
Fuel Treatment: Fuel Scoops and On Board Fuel Purification
Architects Fee: MCr 0.328 Cost in Quantity: MCr 26.244

Detailed Description
HULL
100.000 tons standard, 1,386.000 cubic meters, Streamlined Annular Ring Configuration
CREW
Pilot, Gunner
ENGINEERING
Jump-0, 2G Manuever, Power plant-3, 2.970 EP, Agility 0
AVIONICS
Model/1 Computer
HARDPOINTS
1 Hardpoint
ARMAMENT
1 Dual Beam Laser Turret organised into 1 Battery (Factor-3)
FUEL
2.970 Tons Fuel (0 parsecs jump and 28 days endurance)
On Board Fuel Scoops, On Board Fuel Purification Plant
MISCELLANEOUS
3.0 Staterooms, 2 Acceleration Couches, 1 Emergency Low Berth, 63.00 Tons Cargo
COST
MCr 33.133 Singly (incl. Architects fees of MCr 0.328), MCr 26.244 in Quantity
CONSTRUCTION TIME
38 Weeks Singly, 30 Weeks in Quantity
COMMENTS
Gives total package J2 and M1, Please note that Service Module Cargo Capacity is HIGHER than X Boat Fuel Requirements so that it could be used as a refueler only or carried with the xboat.
 
Last edited:
There have been a lot of interesting ideas tossed around in this thread. I'd like it very much if some of you would get together and co-author an article for Freelance Traveller's Shipyard, discussing the various ideas and including properly credited worked-out examples. Deckplans and renders of the results would be a nice bonus.
 
Anyone care to chime in on Jeff's offer to publish this thread as a proper article ?
Happy to offer my services as editor to compile and collected the supporting texts and images for this opportunity.

Would be great to present two different refits, one as the 100 ton X-hull with 100 ton service hull and the other a dedicated 200 ton hull consisting of the X-hull permanently joined to a service hull.

A given that full credit to all contributors and their works recognized.

Thanks !
 
None of the above options seem that outlandish when I think of what I've been asked to referee by a ex-navy engineer with mech-4, elec-4 and eng-4 (dam that White dwarf self made traveller article)
 
Back
Top