Well, that I can agree with you about 100%. What you do in your own TU is your affair and your affair only. (To me this is so much of a truism that I feel annoyed when someone points it out to me ). But it also makes any sort of discussion about IRIS fairly moot. No offense, but I'm not really very interested in your TU (and, I hasten to add, I don't expect others to be very much interested in my TU). (There are exceptions, of course -- for example, I'm fascinated with alternate universes and enjoy descriptions of campaigns set in such.)Originally posted by kaladorn:
My objection to the anti-IRIS stance was that I felt I was being branded as stupid for having made my decision as to what I thought my TU should include (IMTU, Strephon is still as fake as he was originally, and SM retcon is mostly ignored). I thought that a bit unfair for it depended on a set of selections of what is and is not canon or the right way to do things as personal (although different) as my own.
Unless otherwise noted, I assume any public discussion is about the OTU (or the GTU (when there is a difference)). If we don't have a common reference frame, what's the point?
I have to confess that I also have a tendency to overlook those otherwise notes, so if you made a point about talking about your TU earlier in the discussion, I apologize for giving you a hard time.
Hans