Before T20 was released it was mentioned that you would be doing a PDF version of the rule book. Is this still the case or has the idea been dropped due to piracy?
Exactly how would you determine if the person requesting a PDF is purchaser of the rulebook?Originally posted by Big Tim:
I would vote for a PDF version as well. Maybe make it available to those that have already bought the rule-book.
I've fount that rather strange as well. Especially when they compare MS to WotC.Originally posted by Big Tim:
on a side pet-peeve, note, I think it's funny that I'll talk with someone who blasts Microsoft and thinks the 'open source' is the only way to go, yet will tell me that WoTC owns the XP chart and if anyone reproduces it they're breaking the law.......
I've never played D&D with the D20 rules, but I do own it. I picked up T20 because while I've always liked the background, I've never really liked any of the previous rules sets and T20 looked promising. It's been a while since I looked at anything dealing with Traveller, so I didn't know that T5 had even been discussed when I picked up T20.Originally posted by Reginald:
QUERY: Is it me or is the majority of the T20 owners are not D&D gamers? Are they buying T20 due to lack of a new Traveller game as promised by Far Future?[/QB]
Originally posted by Reginald:
[QB]Still, I couldn't find the formula in the SRD.
I don't think the formula is mentioned anywhere in any D20 / T20 products. This is a standard progression and would be very difficult to copyright. IE try to copyright 2+2=4 so when anyone adds 2+2 they must pay me a royalty.
--Chris
The mini's thing started out in the OGL document because as 3e was coming out WOTC also had "Chainmail" and it's associated mini's coming out and they didn't want any competition. Well that version of Chainmail stank (imo and all that) and was whacked in August 2002.What got me is the Usage Guide also states you can't include minatures in your d20 product. Which really gets my goat if I am reading this correctly d20 games can't have minatures associated with them, I like to use minatures. I guess it could be gotten around, by naming your minature line not associated with your game.
--Chris[/QB]
I don't think the formula is mentioned anywhere in any D20 / T20 products. This is a standard progression and would be very difficult to copyright. IE try to copyright 2+2=4 so when anyone adds 2+2 they must pay me a royalty.</font>[/QUOTE]I almost forgot. You are correct. You cannot copyright mathematic equation.Originally posted by johnsocp:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Reginald:
Still, I couldn't find the formula in the SRD.
NO, it means you cannot market miniatures product line using the d20 logo. So use your own trademark or brand, if you have a pen-and-paper product and slap that on the miniatures package.Originally posted by johnsocp:
What got me is the Usage Guide also states you can't include minatures in your d20 product. Which really gets my goat if I am reading this correctly d20 games can't have minatures associated with them, I like to use minatures. I guess it could be gotten around, by naming your minature line not associated with your game.