Ackehece
SOC-13
I thought I'd read 1900...
I was referring to the new adventure

T5.1 overall setting is Galaxiad but I was/still am not sure if the new intro adventure is Galaxiad or not.
I thought I'd read 1900...
Yes, M1900 is the presumed era for the core. It's not detailed in the core, but it's mentioned, and the galactic map is for M1900. Also known as the Galaxiad era.
Kickstarter is live.
Traveller Fifth Edition, via @Kickstarter https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/traveller5/traveller-fifth-edition
As someone who debarked from T5 after the Beta I appreciate this last: it'll be interesting to see how far 5.1 has come since the Beta days.***
Concern #4. You just want the updated PDFs. Frankly, if you bought the PDFs as a download in the previous Kickstarter, or as a CDROM in the T5 Beta even before that, I am committed to providing the updated files at little or no cost. If you are in my files, I will provide: A Download Coupon by email, or an updated CDROM (if you order some other CDROM from me at FarFuture.net), or a standalone CDROM for $7 to cover shipping and duplication. There are some of you who have been getting updated T5 files from me for years.
Thank you for your support. You have helped make May Day a day of celebration.
Marc
As someone who debarked from T5 after the Beta I appreciate this last: it'll be interesting to see how far 5.1 has come since the Beta days.
As someone who debarked from T5 after the Beta I appreciate this last: it'll be interesting to see how far 5.1 has come since the Beta days.
World of difference. I couldn't stand T5. But I'm using T5.10 all the time.
Compared to Beta it is practically unrecognizable.
Compared to Beta it is practically unrecognizable.
Compared to Beta it is practically unrecognizable.
I'm just not the target audience for T5.x anything, but will probably look it over to see what I can mine for my CT/CE game. Unless T5.x ditched the xd6 roll under, way more skills than I care to have, way more involved chargen than I care to undertake, etc. it's more out of curiosity. But I'm glad it's been funded so quickly for those who are its target audience.![]()
Yes.I guess the point to all this waffle is the big question of 'Is T5 now fixed?'. If it is, and I can get assurances to this, I will put the money down for the kickstarter. What I don't want is three books arriving that are essentially the same as the current T5 book that I already have!
This.
How different is 5.10 I wonder?
I was an original backer and got the PDFs and the first printing of the actual book. Despite many attempts to use T5, many of its systems produced some quite odd results, or simply didn't work - an example being melee combat.
The concept of T5 has always intrigued me, especially the wealth of information in the book, but alas, it was too broken and I went back to my good old CT.
Recently, I got hold of the Traveller 2016 edition (Mongoose? Not sure), those rules look very good indeed, though I have yet to use them in anger.
I guess the point to all this waffle is the big question of 'Is T5 now fixed?'. If it is, and I can get assurances to this, I will put the money down for the kickstarter. What I don't want is three books arriving that are essentially the same as the current T5 book that I already have!
Interesting - it has the full table of contents for the three books![]()
![]()
![]()
It does. And isn't the plural of appendix appendices, not appendixes? If so, and that is a sign of the editing, I am still concerned.
Well, I did look it up and it can be both ways. At least he moved the tables and table of dice percentage to an appendix rather than one of the first things you readAlthough I think appendixes is supposed to be the plural of the human organ, not the text appendix. So maybe still concerned...