I've always been a fan of the 10mm round from Aliens. This is one forum where my substantial knowledge of guns is that of a child's, but I'll pipe in anyway (just for kicks). I believe Bryan mentioned he liked the relative simplicity of the Aliens M41A1 design. That is a good example of what I consider to be a fairly effective ACR. It has a larger caliber to allow for a more substantial bullet that has extra features like "Armor Piercing Explosive." This is important when normal rounds would be defeated easily by their body armor.
The Weapon vs Armor Competition thread in the T20 Q&A folder is rather interesting too, but it's mostly T20 game mechanics.
I feel that an ACR should have the gadgets that the TL it's made at can produce with a certain level of ruggedness. I most shoot handguns, but I already appreciate the value of a rugged weapon. I own a Glock. It's an extremely simple pistol to operate and it's virtually indestructible. It doesn't really *need* to be cleaned that often, and it's incredibly easy to field strip when you do need to clean it. Having a weapon that breaks when you look at it sideways is not something that your troops are going to appreciate. As much as I like lasers and plasma guns, I think this is why Traveller (rather uniquely in the sci-fi world) usually has projectile weapons up until the very highest of TL's.
People often assume that "space travel = hand held energy weapons", a la Star Trek or Star Wars (not sci-fi, I know I know
![Cool :cool: :cool:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png)
). However, in my opinion, it's becoming far more likely that we'll achieve some level of real space flight long before creating a reliable laser pistol. I suppose lasers would be useful in a zero-g environment, simply because you aren't as likely to smack your gun hard when you hit the dirt.
What do you guys think of gauss rifles (or David Webers "grav pulsers") as weapons? I generally think they are an interesting idea, and I believe I've seen calculations that show that a gauss-style weapon is a much more efficient energy projector than a laser or particle beam. <shrug>
Regardless, this is a really interesting discussion (provided it gets back on track) and I've enjoyed reading it. I know the modern tendancy to go for low caliber, high velocity rounds is supposed to increase armor penetration, but I think it might be reversed again to higher tech ammo as armor technology gets better and better.
COmments?