Originally posted by daryen:
The fake Strephon was never defined. (Which was probably a good thing.) His full motivations never explained. (Or even really hinted at.)
When MT came out I took the stance that a stand in Strephon was murdered because of the old DGP magazine.
In the issue that focused on Capital, four PCs get knighted by the Emperor, including a Pseudo-Bio robot. The Emperor knew about him and referred to him as AB-101, not the name Aybee Wan Owan.
The Emperor then asked two questions about AB-101:
</font>
- How much did he cost in construction?</font>
- Could make one in my image so I can spend more time waterskying?</font>
These two questions indicated that use of doubles was either used or considered. IMO the waterskiing reference is probaly where the idea of Strephon being either a weak or lazy emperor. Mostly likely this was a cover for the real use of the imposters.
In this same issue, they had an adventure that played out the assassination. I put two and two together and decided that Strephon wasn't there. He was either on holiday, involved with some other business, or he suspect of the plot and waited for Dulinor to strike. In any of these cases, especially the last, I also figure the Empress and Grand Princess had stand ins, either clones, actors, or robots.
So I was happy that Strephon survived. If things went differently in the first couple years of the Rebellion, I could have seen him returning to the throne. IIRC someone over at TML did set of essays that explored this outcome. That would have made an interesting mega-campaign.
Originally posted by daryen:
And all of the other confusing stuff is confusing because it was added later, pretty much directly in the face of what had come first. IRIS was a tack-on and always felt that way. Strephon did stupid things because he wasn't supposed to be real, but then was after all. Things like that.
Your take on the IRIS is the same I have. As I discussed previously with LD, the IRIS seem to be a pet project that got written into OTU. It could have easily been a cabal of Moot delegates that formed a succession committee, whose duty was to continue even if the Moot is disbanded.
Though I have to agree with the mind set that Strephon had during the Hard Times and Arrival Vengeance. Because of secrecy and bad decisions Strephon was guilty of making the situation worse. In the end, he was a broken man that wanted to be left alone.
Originally posted by daryen:
Same thing for Margaret's nuttiness. She turned evil because the writers needed her to be totally unsympathetic, not because she was an evil bitch the whole time.
I never saw her as evil. She was a traditional Imperial Noble who saw the 3rd Imperium as a framework for large scale intersteller commerce, which was one of the foundations set by Cleon I. Her problem was she never looked beyond the numbers. Any social problems were considered adverse effects to the economic health of sector. The concept is true and it work well during peacetime, but it just didn't translate well during war.
IMO Margarat was probaly like Hitler in someways. Without getting a discussion on what he did or did not know or order, various civilian and military members of the 3rd Reich inner circle all mention that Hitler dealt with abstractions and the general. He didn't really cared about how something was done, as long it was done. Some of the crimes committed by the officials was from them using what ever means to satisfied the Fuhrer's orders. On the rare occasion that Hitler looked at problem in detail, his reaction and solution would become the basis for all other problems. In summary, did Margarat just tell people to get something done without outlining how or following up on how the orders were executed.
This brings up some questions: How much detail did Margarat know about the corporate slavery, genocide, and other crimes that was committed in her name? Was the crimes really the result of corporate and military leaders following directives, but never telling the methods used only reporting a successful conclusion?
Was Margarat a criminal? Yes, as faction leader was responcible for the actions of her officers and advisors when they committed crimes while performing thier duties. If she gave specifice instructions than she personnally guilty of various crimes and atrocities.