creativehum
SOC-14 1K
For Corona Virus Deaths by Country, look here.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/coronavirus/
Take a good look at the deaths per million figure.
What I'm seeing is that Russian is lying.
Can you be any more specific?
For Corona Virus Deaths by Country, look here.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/coronavirus/
Take a good look at the deaths per million figure.
The whole idea of "flattening the curve" was to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed. But this extended shut-down instead has lead to hospital layoffs and potential bankruptcies because normal elective surgeries and even outpatient services are suspended.
It is a fool's errand to think that the virus can be eliminated. Our actions can't really change the pool of virus in the population without a vaccine.
That's moving the goalposts, IMO. Sure, test when people come to the doctor or hospital as part of a treatment plan. Then the doc can say, "Don't worry, you have the flu which has only killed 40k people instead of 90k."Not quite.
Another massive part of "flattening the curve" was to give the federal government time to put in place systems for testing and tracing -- like any other functioning first world nation managed to do.
The idea that testing will solve the problem is also a fool's errand. If you tested me yesterday, it means almost nothing today.This is clearly not true. Testing and tracing are actions that can change the pool of virus in the population before a vaccine is found.
Testing isn't about you (mostly).That's moving the goalposts, IMO. Sure, test when people come to the doctor or hospital as part of a treatment plan. Then the doc can say, "Don't worry, you have the flu which has only killed 40k people instead of 90k."
The idea that testing will solve the problem is also a fool's errand. If you tested me yesterday, it means almost nothing today.
Sure. They count any death that even remotely could have been from SARS-CoV-2 as a CoVID-19 death. Other places are less strict about it (die with all the symptoms, but never got tested? Not the 'rona, sorry. Heart attack or stroke from CoVID-19 aftereffects? Not 'rona either. Not a state resident? Not our business, maybe your home state will report it eventually. And so on...).Can you tell me why Belgium has almost double the deaths per million of their neighbors in France, more than double Netherlands, four times that of Luxembourg, and over EIGHT TIMES the deaths per million of neighboring Germany? Nope, nobody can. They share borders, had free movement over those borders up until quarantines were ordered, have similar geography (at least for nearby regions of France and Germany) and urban density. They had similar quarantine rules, too. Testing isn't going to tell you.
Italy got slammed from Chinese tourists before they knew what hit them. The UK was actively trying to expose everyone (herd immunity) until they realized how many corpses that meant. I already discussed Belgium.Can testing explain why Sweden, famous for flouting the expert advise and restricting only large gatherings (was it 500?), has deaths per million lower than France, UK, Italy, Spain (which may have had the strictest quarantine measures of all), and Belgium and only 30% higher than USA?
The entry point from China was mostly San Francisco, which locked down the entire Bay Area hard and fast once they knew what was happening. They know from pandemics (AIDS...). Those most likely to have been exposed were also those with the resources to self-isolate by working from home and shopping online. And there's a LOT of California that has nothing to do with SF -- or Los Angeles (particularly the high-end areas and around LAX) for that matter -- and wouldn't be in contact with China travelers or those they encountered.California probably had far more passengers from China in December and January than any of those countries, and yet California has only 81 deaths per million, lower than every country in western Europe except Austria.
No, nobody needs to be tested unless they're actually sick. Even if you can trace contacts it may not show up if you test too early in incubation. Maybe 14 days after contact, when incubation is almost guaranteed complete, a test might be useful. It's pointless to test the general population, a complete waste of time and resources, or worse yet, a tool for manipulation.What testing does mean is that if you pop positive, you need to be quarantined and your contacts traced to find others who need to be quarantined. Repeat until you find all the positives or hit dead ends. Keep at it long enough and you might be able to control things -- but that takes testing and manpower and money and... well, maybe that's not an option.
In other words, reporting is not reliable and everyone keeps reporting as though. No, UK dropped their herd immunity approach because France insisted they would close Calais to Brits if UK didn't adopt tighter restrictions.Sure. They count any death that even remotely could have been from SARS-CoV-2 as a CoVID-19 death. Other places are less strict about it (die with all the symptoms, but never got tested? Not the 'rona, sorry. Heart attack or stroke from CoVID-19 aftereffects? Not 'rona either. Not a state resident? Not our business, maybe your home state will report it eventually. And so on...). Italy got slammed from Chinese tourists before they knew what hit them. The UK was actively trying to expose everyone (herd immunity) until they realized how many corpses that meant. I already discussed Belgium.
Haha, no. AIDS was never a pandemic. It does not spread by casual contact, nor were any restrictions placed on the general public. This shelter-in-place thing is entirely new. It has never been done even for the plague.The entry point from China was mostly San Francisco, which locked down the entire Bay Area hard and fast once they knew what was happening. They know from pandemics (AIDS...). Those most likely to have been exposed were also those with the resources to self-isolate by working from home and shopping online. And there's a LOT of California that has nothing to do with SF -- or Los Angeles (particularly the high-end areas and around LAX) for that matter -- and wouldn't be in contact with China travelers or those they encountered.
Test, retest after 4 days. Should catch most cases -- some immediately, some after incubation. By 14 days, the cases that are symptomatic will have manifested symptoms...No, nobody needs to be tested unless they're actually sick. Even if you can trace contacts it may not show up if you test too early in incubation. Maybe 14 days after contact, when incubation is almost guaranteed complete, a test might be useful. It's pointless to test the general population, a complete waste of time and resources, or worse yet, a tool for manipulation.
Which means everyone else is undercounting (we already know this from excess deaths year-over-year). Doesn't help your case.In other words, reporting is not reliable and everyone keeps reporting as though.
That too.No, UK dropped their herd immunity approach because France insisted they would close Calais to Brits if UK didn't adopt tighter restrictions.
Granted. But it was a remarkably persistent (still is, but treatable) epidemic, and it's a close-to-home demonstration of what happens when you ignore rapidly spreading disease.Haha, no. AIDS was never a pandemic. It does not spread by casual contact, nor were any restrictions placed on the general public.
1918 Spanish Flu response came close. Admittedly, it wasn't nationwide, but in the places it was in place, when it was in place, it worked. When the lockdowns were lifted, it came back. See the experience of St. Louis vs. Philadelphia, and the 3rd wave in St. Louis for an example.This shelter-in-place thing is entirely new. It has never been done even for the plague.
But wow, CA was doing so amazingly well wasn't it, just a few posts back?While SF Bay area had about 5000 arrivals/day from China, LA had about 8000/day. Yet LA has significantly more cases/deaths per 100k. I don't think reporting for LA is that different from reporting in other counties.
a) How do you know that they aren't actually sick if they aren't tested?No, nobody needs to be tested unless they're actually sick.
Vargr face masks would be practically a muzzle
By contrast, my daughter was speaking to by someone who has just had her child die of this; another daughter's step-children have had it. The local Hospital was full to overflowing - but is now less so - but if anyone gets anything else (including a number of my friends and family) they cannot get the normal level of service because of the potential fatality of their stay in Hospital or their post-hospital recuperation. The UK apparently has a very different take on the level of corporate responsibility required by the individual to that in some of the US. The level of "Tut Tut"ing here, aimed at larger gatherings and those who break lockdown guidelines is quite high.My wife and I drove up to Lake Geneva, Wisconsin today, to have dinner at one of our favorite restaurants. It was a bit crowded when we got there, so while my wife explored some of her favorite shops, I sat down on a bench and people-watched.
Well, I'm in a different kind of lockdown tonight. My house is one block off of a major commercial avenue in the Twin Cities, and every business on the street for a stretch of about two miles around me is either looted or on fire. Or both.
While avoiding the politics of it, I just want to comment how weird it is to be in the heart of a major city and see buildings burn to the ground around you because there are not enough firefighting assets to handle them all, and so some must be triaged.